期刊文献+

水胶体敷料预防压疮的Meta分析 被引量:27

Hydrocolloid dressings for preventing pressure ulcers: A Meta-analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价使用水胶体敷料联合常规护理预防压疮的有效性。方法检索中英文可及数据库中关于评价水胶体敷料用于压疮预防的随机对照实验(RCT)和类实验研究。提取资料用Revman5.0软件进行数据处理和分析。结果共纳入17篇文献,1371例患者。Meta分析结果显示:存在压疮风险的患者,预防性使用水胶体敷料联合常规护理组比常规护理组压疮发生率低,RR=0.29,95%CI(0.18,0.46);使用无创正压通气的患者,预防性使用水胶体敷料联合常规护理组比常规护理组压疮发生率低,RR=O.30,95%CI(0.18,0.52)。结论存在压疮风险的患者和使用无创正压通气的患者,预防性使用水胶体敷料联合常规护理能更有效的预防压疮。 Objective To evaluate the effects of hydrocolloid dressings with conventional care in the prevention of pressure ulcers. Methods Randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials, which assessed the effects of hydrocolloid dressings in preventing pressure ulcers compared to conventional care were sought. Data were pooled using RevMan 5.0. Results 17 eligible trials were identified with a total of 1 371 study participants. Meta-analysis showed that:Compared to conventional care, conventional care and hydrocolloid dressings were effective for preventing pressure ulcers for patients at risk of pressure ulcers [RR=0.29,95%CI (0.18,0.46)] and using noninvasive positive pressure ventilator [RR=0.30,95%CI (0.18,0.52). Conclusions Hydrocolloid dressings and conventional care can reduce the pressure ulcer incidence of patients at risk of pressure ulcer or using noninvasive positive pressure ventilator.
出处 《中国实用护理杂志》 北大核心 2014年第20期74-78,共5页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
关键词 压疮 预防 敷料 水胶体 META分析 Pressure ulcer Prevention Hydrocolloid Dressing Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Prevention of pressure ulcers: Quick Reference Guide[D J. Washington DC:National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, 2009.
  • 2Vanderwee K, Clark M, Dealey C, et al. Pressure ulcer prevalence in Europe: a pilot study[Jl. J Eval Clin Pract, 2007,13(2) :227 -235.
  • 3Bo M, Massaia M, Raspo S, et al. Predictive factors of in - hospital mortality in older patients admitted to a medical intensive care unite J J. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2003,51 (4): 529-533.
  • 4Van Rongen E. The view of the Health Council of The Netherlandsj J]. Bull World Health Organ, 1999, 77( 1) :79-81.
  • 5Bennett G, Dealey C ,Posnett J. The cost of pressure ulcers in the VK [J]. Age Ageing, 2004,33(3 ) : 230- 235.
  • 6Clarke M, Oxman AD. Cochrane Reviewers Handbook 4.0 Section [M]. The Cochrane Collaboration Oxford: V pdate Software, 2000: 15.
  • 7Nakagami G,Sanada H,Konya C,et al. Evaluation of a new pressure ulcer preventive dressing containing ceramide 2 with low frictional outer layerl J]. J Adv Nurs, 2007 ,59(5) :520-529.
  • 8Weng MH. The effect of protective treatment in reducing pressure ulcers for non-invasive ventilation patients[J]. Intensive Crit Care Nurs, 2008,24(5) :295-299.
  • 9Mei YH, Shiau RH, Hui CC, et al. Evaluating dressings for the prevention of facial pressure ulcers caused by the application of noninvasive positive pressure ventilator patients:a pilot study [ll. EWMA Journal, 2011,11(2):213.
  • 10Winter GO. Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig [J]. Nature, 1962,193:293-294.

二级参考文献101

共引文献411

同被引文献243

引证文献27

二级引证文献193

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部