摘要
目的应用Vector系统、Gracey手工刮治治疗牙周病患者,以比较患者不同治疗方法的疼痛程度,总结护理要点。方法选择60例牙周炎患者,随机分实验组和对照组各30例,分别采用Vector系统、Gracey手工刮治技术,在治疗后即刻进行疼痛视觉模拟评分法(Visual Analogue Scale/Score,简称VAS)评估2组患者的疼痛程度。结果使用Vector系统治疗的患者轻度以下疼痛占66%,常规Gracev手工刮治的患者轻度以下疼痛占36%,实验组有24例愿意接受使用Vector系统再进行牙周病常规护理,23例自觉对于治疗时的恐惧心理有所缓解。结论Vector系统对牙周病患者进行治疗,减少了患者的疼痛,增加了患者的依从性,良好的护理配合,熟练的“四手”操作,可保证Vector系统治疗牙周病的效果。
Objective The study aimed to compare the vector system with the hand instrument in the pain severity during scaling and root planning. Methods 60 periodontal patients were randomly divided into two groups for supportive periodontal therapy (SFF): the experimental group (using vector system) and the control group (using gracey instruments), with 30 cases in each group. And the painfulness after SPT was evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Results 66% patients felt mild pain during the supportive periodontal therapy with the application of vector system, while 36% patients felt mild pain in the control group. 24 patients in the experimental group accepted vector system for SPT and 23 patients in the experimental group felt less fear of the treatment. Conclusions Patients will feel less discomfort with the application of the vector system, therefore better compliance will be reached. And the cooperation of the doctors and nurses has great impact on the treatment effect.
出处
《中国实用护理杂志》
北大核心
2014年第21期46-48,共3页
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
关键词
牙周病
刮治
疼痛
Vector系统
Periodontics
Scaling and root planning
Pain
Vector system