期刊文献+

Effect of solids on pulp and froth properties in flotation 被引量:6

Effect of solids on pulp and froth properties in flotation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Froth flotation is a widely used process of particle separation exploiting differences in surface properties. It is important to point out that overall flotation performance(grade and recovery) is a consequence of the quality and quantity of the solid particles collected from the pulp phase, transported into the froth phase, and surviving as bubble-particle aggregates into the overflow. This work will focus on studying these phenomena and will incorporate the effects of particle hydrophobicities in the 3-phase system. Solids are classed as either hydrophilic non-sulphide gangue(e.g. silica, talc), hydrophilic sulphide(e.g. pyrite), or hydrophobic sulphide(e.g. sphalerite). Talc is a surface-active species of gangue that has been shown to behave differently from silica(frother adsorbs on the surface of talc particles). Both are common components of ores and will be studied in detail. The focus of this work is to investigate the role of solids on pulp hydrodynamics, froth bubble coalescence intensity, water overflow rate with solids present, and in particular, the interactions between solids, frother and gas on the gas dispersion parameters. The results show that in the pulp zone there is no effect of solids on bubble size and gas holdup; in the froth zone, although hydrophilic particles solely do not effect on the water overflow rate, hydrophobic particles produce higher intensity of rates on water overflow and bubble coalescence, and many be attributed to the water reattachment. Froth flotation is a widely used process of particle separation exploiting differences in surface properties. It is important to point out that overall flotation performance(grade and recovery) is a consequence of the quality and quantity of the solid particles collected from the pulp phase, transported into the froth phase, and surviving as bubble-particle aggregates into the overflow. This work will focus on studying these phenomena and will incorporate the effects of particle hydrophobicities in the 3-phase system. Solids are classed as either hydrophilic non-sulphide gangue(e.g. silica, talc), hydrophilic sulphide(e.g. pyrite), or hydrophobic sulphide(e.g. sphalerite). Talc is a surface-active species of gangue that has been shown to behave differently from silica(frother adsorbs on the surface of talc particles). Both are common components of ores and will be studied in detail. The focus of this work is to investigate the role of solids on pulp hydrodynamics, froth bubble coalescence intensity, water overflow rate with solids present, and in particular, the interactions between solids, frother and gas on the gas dispersion parameters. The results show that in the pulp zone there is no effect of solids on bubble size and gas holdup; in the froth zone, although hydrophilic particles solely do not effect on the water overflow rate, hydrophobic particles produce higher intensity of rates on water overflow and bubble coalescence, and many be attributed to the water reattachment.
出处 《Journal of Central South University》 SCIE EI CAS 2014年第4期1461-1469,共9页 中南大学学报(英文版)
基金 financially supported by the Chair in Mineral Processing at McGill University, under the Collaborative Research and Development program of NSERC (Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada) with industrial sponsorship from Vale, Teck Cominco, Xstrata Process Support, Agnico-Eagle, Shell Canada, Barrick Gold, COREM, SGS Lakefield Research and Flottec
关键词 固体颗粒 泡沫性能 浮选矿浆 颗粒分离 表面活性物质 表面性质 二氧化硅 颗粒聚集体 flotation frothers bubble size coalescence gas holdup hydrophobicity
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1CROZIER R, KLIMPEL R. Frothing in flotation [M]. LASKOWSKI J S, Ed. Chapter 11, New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1989: 257-280.
  • 2FINCH J A, DOBBY G S. Column flotation [M]. New York: Pergamon Press, 1990: 343-354.
  • 3KLIMPEL R, ISHERWOOD S. Some industrial implications of changing frother chemical structure [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 1991, 33: 369-381.
  • 4NESSET J E, ZHANG Wei, FINCH J A. A benchmarking tool for assessing flotation cell performance [C]// Proceedings of 44th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mineral Processors (CIM). Ottawa, Canada: 2012: 183-209.
  • 5LEJA J, SCHULMAN J H. Flotation theory: Molecular interactions between frothers and collectors at solid-liquid-air interfaces [J]. AIME Trans, 1954, 199:221-228.
  • 6ZHANG Wei, ZHOU X, FINCH J A. Determining independent control of dual-frother systems-gas holdup, bubble size and water overflow rate [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2012, 39:106-116.
  • 7COMLEY B A, VERA M A, FRANZIDIS J P. Interpretation of the effect of frother type and concentration on flotation performance in an OK3 cell [J]. Mineral and Metallurgical Processing, 2007, 24(4): 243-252.
  • 8ZHANG Wei, NESSET J E, FINCH J A. Water recovery and bubble surface area flux in flotation [J]. Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, 2010, 49(4): 353-362.
  • 9ZHANG Wei, NESSET J E, RAO S R, FINCH J A. Characterizing frothers through critical coalescence concentration (CCC95)- hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) [J]. Minerals, 2012, 2(3): 208-227.
  • 10STEVENSON P, STEVANOV C, JAMESON G J. Liquid overflow from a column of rising aqueous froth [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2003, 16(11): 1045-1053.

同被引文献21

引证文献6

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部