中外图书馆学学者引证行为比较分析

Comparative Analysis on Citation Behaviors Between Chinese Scholars and Foreign Scholars of the Library Science

选择中外图书馆学典型期刊近10年的数据,从引用量和类型、高被引文献、高被引作者及同被引、引用半衰期等方面比较分析中外图书馆学学者引证行为得出:中外图书馆学论文篇均引用量呈递增趋势;期刊、图书、网络文献是中外图书馆学学者主要引用文献来源;国内高被引文献中图书占大多数,国外则是期刊;《中国图书馆学报》和College and Research Libraries分别是中外图书馆学学者引用最多的期刊;国内图书馆学高被引作者是张晓林、吴慰慈等学者,国外则是著名团体作者和Hernon、Davis等学者;国外图书馆学学者引用的内容侧重图书馆服务,国内则关注图书馆学基础理论;国外图书馆学引文半衰期比国内长,但国内引文半衰期较国外稳定。

Selecting typical Chinese and foreign library science journals, comparatively analyzing citation behaviors between Chinese scholars and foreign scholars of the library science from the citation quantity and the type, the high cited literature, highly cited authors, the co-citation, the citation half-life, it finds that the citation quantity per atricle of the library science at home and abroad shows the increasing trend; the journal, the book, the network literature are major sources of the cited literature by library scholars at home and abroad; the book accounts for the most in domestic high cited literatures and the journal is majority abroad; Journal of Library Science in China and College and Research Libraries are respectively the most cited journals by library scholars at home and abroad; highly cited authors of the domestic library science are Zhang Xiaolin and Wu Weici, and so on, and foreign scholars are famons corporate author, Hernon and Davis, and so on; foreign scholars focus on the library service in the cited content, and domestic scholars focus on the basic theory of the library science; the foreign library science citation half- life is longer than the domestic, but the domestic citation half-life is relatively stable.