期刊文献+

应用实时荧光定量技术评价粉红粘帚霉对水稻纹枯病的田间防治效果 被引量:4

Assessment the biocontrol efficacy of Gliocladium roseum on rice sheath blight using Real-time fluorescent PCR method
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究利用实时荧光定量PCR技术监测施用生防菌前后土壤中粉红粘帚霉67-1和水稻纹枯病菌AG-IIA的数量,并调查发病情况,收割后测产,评估生防菌粉红粘帚霉67-1的田间防治效果。实时荧光定量检测结果表明,粉红粘帚霉67-1防治水稻纹枯病的效果随着用药浓度的增加而增强,各处理间差异极显著。用药后土壤中粉红粘帚霉67-1的含量在一定时间内随培养时间的延长逐渐升高,停止用药后逐渐减少。水稻纹枯病菌在清水对照组中没有显著变化,在处理组中水稻纹枯病菌的数量随时间降低。60 g/667 m2菌量的防效及产量与井冈霉素对照组差异不显著。防病保产结果与实时荧光定量结果基本一致,说明粉红粘帚霉67-1的孢子制剂对水稻纹枯病具有优良的田间防治效果,实时荧光定量PCR技术可以用于生物防治效果的田间评价。 Gliocladium is important biocontrol microbe and the protection and therapy Gliocladium roseum 67-1 had been proved. This paper aimed at evaluation field efficacy of 67-1 protect and control rice sheath blight of G. roseum 67-1 and Rhizoctonia solani AG-1IA by the method of Realtime fluorescent quantitative PCRdisease indexand yield. The Real-time PCR results found that the numbers of 67-1 increased with time, the highest quantity at the 22th day and then decreased. Additionally, the numbers of rice sheath blight pathogen A-1IA no significant change in the pure water, and data of 60g/667m^2 treatment had no obviously difference with that of validamycin A control. Field trial results showed that G. roseum 67-1 had obvious of protect and therapy, which increase the yield of rice. In conclusion, the G. roseum 67-1 spore was effective in controling rice sheath blight pathogen, and Real-time PCR could be used for evaluation of efficacy of biocontrol agents.
出处 《植物病理学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期422-427,共6页 Acta Phytopathologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30971954) 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目
关键词 粉红粘帚霉 水稻纹枯病菌 荧光定量PCR 田间防治效果 Gliocladium roseum rice sheath blight real-time fluorescent PCR Field efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献55

  • 1张穗,许文霞,薛银根,陈秀英,王金荣.郑州郊区水稻纹枯病菌对井冈霉素敏感性的初步研究[J].中国生物防治,1995,11(4):171-173. 被引量:31
  • 2汤坚,黄长春,丁珊王成树,李增智.球孢白僵菌制剂载体的筛选[J].安徽农业大学学报,1996,23(3):351-354. 被引量:12
  • 3张拥华,李磊,彭志刚,李世东.粘帚霉可湿性粉剂助剂的初步研究[J].农药,2007,46(2):94-96. 被引量:21
  • 4Vargas Gil S, Pastor G S, March G J. Quantitative isolation of biocontrol agents Trichoderma spp., Gliocladium spp. and actinomycetes from soil with culture media[J]. Microbiological Research, 2006
  • 5Kubicek C P, Harman G E. Trichoderma and Gliocladium[M]. USA, Taylor & Francis Ltd. Press, 1998.
  • 6Cordier C, Edel-Hermann V, Martin-Laurent F, et al. SCAR - based real time PCR to identify a biocontrol strain (T1) of Trichoderma atroviride and study its population dynamics in soils[J]. Microbiological Methods, 2007, 68: 60- 68.
  • 7Davey C B, Papavizas G C. Comparison of methods for isolating Rhizoctonia from soil[J]. Canadian J Microbiol, 1962, 8: 847- 853.
  • 8Papavizas G C, Adams P B, Lumsden R D, et al. Ecology and epidemiology of Rhizoctonia solani in soil[J]. Phytopathology, 1975, 65 : 871 - 877.
  • 9vn Bruggen A H C, Arneson P A. Quantitative recovery of Rhizoctonia solani in soil[J]. Plant Diseases, 1986, 70: 320- 323.
  • 10Castro C J, Davis J R, Wiese M V. Quantitative estimation of Rhizoctonia solani AG-3 in soil[J].Phytopathology, 1988, 78:1287 - 1292.

共引文献131

同被引文献89

引证文献4

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部