比较法视域下非法证据排除规则问题研究

Study on the Exclusive Rule of Illegal Evidence from the Perspective of Comparative Law

基于不同的价值观念、目的追求、体制结构以及机制模式,世界各国和地区关于非法证据排除的适用范围、操作程序等各有不同。运用比较方法理论,在对比分析美国、德国、日本等典型国家和地区司法运作的基础上,试图理顺和廓清中国非法证据排除规则的范围、程序以及法律效果,从而为中国的刑事司法实践提供理论基础。

Illegal evidence and the resulting in miscarriages of justice has been a persistent ailment in our judicial system. Specifications of evidence and forensics program have become the focus of the credibility of our judicial decision. Therefore, the revised ＂criminal law＂ and relevant judicial interpretations of the two exclusion of illegal evidence made specific provision. But excluded objects, procedures, and results did not make provisions complete and unified, conversely, these questions would entail judicial problems. Starting from the maintenance of social justice, protection of human rights, the experience of other jurisdictions advanced legislation and judicial operation mode, this paper further clarified the scope of application, the illegal evidence exclusionary rule of procedure and application effect.