期刊文献+

中文版世界卫生组织残疾评定量表的心理测量学特征 被引量:5

Psychometric characteristics of Chinese version of WHO disability rating scale
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]了解中文版世界卫生组织残疾评定量表的心理测量学特征。[方法]应用该量表对201例乳腺癌术后病人进行测量,应用Cronbach’sα系数测定量表的内部一致性信度,应用 Spearman相关分析测定量表的聚合效度,应用探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析检验量表的结构效度。[结果]该量表具有较好的内部一致性信度(Cronbach’sα为0.72-0.92)、聚合效度;当删除4个条目(起立、进食、性活动、有尊严地生活)后,探索性因子分析确立了7个独立因子,即“自理和家务活动”“与人相处”“在四周活动”“理解”“交流”“参与社会”以及“家庭负担”(累积方差贡献率为72.13%);验证性因子分析证明,该模型拟合效果良好(比较拟合指数为0.914,非范拟合指数为0.900,近似误差均方根为0.069)。[结论]中文版世界卫生组织残疾评定量表在中国乳腺癌术后化疗人群中具有较好的信度和效度,经改良后可以应用于中国人群。
出处 《护理研究(中旬版)》 2014年第7期2551-2553,共3页 Chinese Nursing Researsh
基金 辽宁省教育厅2010年高等学校科研立项课题 编号:L2010677
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Mathers CD, Loncar D. Projections of globalmortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030 [J]. PLoS Med, 2006,3 (11 ): 2011 - 2030.
  • 2世界卫生组织分类,评定,调查与术语项目小组,张爱民,蔡飞鸣,鲁玉红,孙铁.世界卫生组织残疾评定项目及其与《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》的关系[J].中国康复理论与实践,2003,9(1):15-17. 被引量:44
  • 3Ustun TB,Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, et al. Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0[J]. Bul- letin of World Health Organization,2010,88(11) :815 - 823.
  • 4World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule lI (WHODAS II )[EB/OL]. [2009 - 07 - 06]. http://www, who. int/icidh/whodas/index, html.
  • 5邱卓英,马洪卓,张春兰.对功能、残疾和健康国际分类中文版的研究[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2001,10(22):16-17. 被引量:6
  • 6Garin O, Ayuso- Mateos J, Almansa J,et al. Validation of the "World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS- 2" in patients with chronic diseases[J]. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes,2010,8(1):51 -66.
  • 7Murphy B, Herrman H, Hawthorne G, et al. Australian WHO- QOL instruments: User's manual and interpretation guide[D]. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne Department of Psychia- try, 2000 : 1.
  • 8Kemmler G, Schemied B, Shetty LA, et al. Quality of life of HIV infected patients: Psychometric properties and validation of the German version of the MQOL - HIV[J]. Quality of Life Research, 2003,12(8) :1037 - 1050.
  • 9Lohr KN. Assessing health status and quality of life instruments: Attributes and review criteria[J]. Quality of Life Research, 2002, 11(3) :193 - 205.
  • 10Chwastiak LA, Von Korff M. Disability in depression and back pain:Evaluation of the World Health Organization Disability As- sessment Schedule (WHODAS II ) in a primary care setting[J]. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2003,56 (6) : 507 - 514.

二级参考文献9

  • 1[1]FENN P.Review of ICIDH 1980[M]. Sociology of Health and Illness: A Journal of Medical Sociology. UK,1982: 24.
  • 2[2]GARDENT H, ROUSSEL P, BONAIATO S, et al. Use of the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH) in Relation to Elderly People[M].London:Council of Europe Publishing,1997:45.
  • 3[3]ALBRECHT GL.The Disability Business: Rehabilitation in America[M]. London: Sage Library of Social Research, UK,1992:43.
  • 4[4]EVANS TG. Socioeconomic consequences of blinding onchocerciasis in West Africa[J].Bulletin of the WHO,1995,73(4):23-27.
  • 5[5]SUSSET V,RAYMOND PM.Prognosis and prediction: From patient to policy[A]//GRANGER CV, GRESHAM GE. Functional Assessment in Rehabilitation Medicine[M].Baltimore:William & Wilkins,1984:84.
  • 6[6]SELTZER GB, GRANGER CV, WINEBERG DE, et al. Functional assessment in primary care[A]//GRANGER CV,GRESHAM GE. Functional Assessment in Rehabilitation Medicine[M]. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins,1984:87.
  • 7[7]HIMMEL PB.Functional assessment strategies in clinical medicine: The care of the arthritic patient[A]//GUANGER CV,GRESHAM GE. Functional Assessment in Rehabilitation Medicine[M].Baltimore:Willams & Wilkins,1984:56.
  • 8邱卓英,吴弦光,董红.国际残损、活动和参与分类新系统研究[J].中国康复理论与实践,1999,5(1):13-16. 被引量:9
  • 9邱卓英,董红,吴弦光.新国际残疾分类系统研究[J].中国康复,1999,14(4):248-251. 被引量:8

共引文献47

同被引文献53

引证文献5

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部