摘要
从经济学上区分定价制度的角度分析,律师按当事人财力大小收费是一种理性的收费人行为。从亚里士多德的矫正的正义和分配的正义的角度论证,律师按当事人财力大小收费符合契约自由原则以及分配正义的原则,是律师将自己高额的教育和培训成本以合理的方式在社会公众中分摊。通过类比经济学上的垄断地位者的价格歧视行为,当一个律师通过"权力寻租"获得影响诉讼案件胜负的权利时,律师的地位处于垄断状态,此时按当事人财力收费类似绑票具有法律和伦理上的不正当性。
It is a rational choice for the lawyer to charge the clients according to their financial ability in perspective of economics. It is also just to do so according to Aristotle＇s justice principles of correction and distribution. This practice is a way to divide the cost of a lawyer＇s education and training cost among his or her clients. But it is unjust to charge higher when a lawyer tums to monopoly through the rent-seeking behavior of power.
出处
《广东技术师范学院学报》
2014年第8期22-28,共7页
Journal of Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University
关键词
律师
收费
正当性
分配正义
lawyer
lawyer＇s fee
justice
distributive justice
