期刊文献+

卡培他滨维持治疗转移性乳腺癌的疗效观察 被引量:6

Clinical observation of capecitabine maintain treatment on metastatic breast cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察卡培他滨维持治疗转移性乳腺癌的疗效和毒副反应。方法:2009年10月-2013年7月,31例转移性乳腺癌一线或二线含卡培他滨联合化疗4-6个周期后,疾病达缓解或稳定的患者,接受卡培他滨维持治疗,卡培他滨1000mg/m2,d1-14,休息7天,21天为1个周期,维持化疗进展或不能耐受毒副反应者化疗停止,每个患者接受至少2个周期维持治疗。结果:卡培他滨维持治疗转移性乳腺癌有效率(RR)为6.5%,临床获益率(CBR)(>6个月)为35.5%,疾病控制率(DCR)为74.2%,中位无进展生存期(PFS)为5.8个月。主要的毒副反应为手足综合征(HFS),发生率为67.7%,多为Ⅰ-Ⅱ度,1例Ⅲ度患者应用大剂量维生素B6且卡培他滨减量后好转。Ⅲ-Ⅳ度白细胞、中性粒细胞下降分别为9.7%和12.9%,明显低于卡培他滨联合化疗时Ⅲ-Ⅳ度白细胞、中性粒细胞下降发生率的35.5%和38.7%(P<0.05)。结论:卡培他滨是维持治疗转移性乳腺癌的有效药物,患者耐受性好,毒副反应较轻。 Objective:To obsere the effect and adverse reaction of capecitabine maintain treating metastatic breast cancer. Methods:During October 2009 to July 2013,31 cases of metastatic breast cancer patients were given the maintain treatment of capecitabine patients were given capecitabine 1000mg/m2, d1-14, rest 7 days. 21 days as 1 cy- cle,at least two cycles maintenance. Results:RR was 6.5% ,clinical benefit rate(CBR) ( 〉 6 months) was 35.5% , disease control rates(DCR) was 74.2%. The median progression- free surial(PFS) was 5.8 months. The main ad- verse reactions was hand -foot syndrome(HFS) incidence was 67.7% ,most were I - Ⅱ degrees, 1 case was Ⅲ de- gree. Ⅲ - IV degree white blood cells fell by 9.7 %, neutrophils fell by 12.9%, which were significantly lower than that of capecitabine chemotherapy in which the incidence rate were 35.5% and 38.7% (P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion: Capecitabine is effective on treating metastatic breast cancer. The adverse reaction is light.
出处 《现代肿瘤医学》 CAS 2014年第7期1599-1601,共3页 Journal of Modern Oncology
关键词 卡培他滨 转移性乳腺癌 维持治疗 capecitabine metastatic breast cancer maintenance therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1王涛,江泽飞,宋三泰,张少华,申戈,于静新.单药希罗达治疗复发转移性乳腺癌的疗效观察[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2004,26(6):379-381. 被引量:57
  • 2曲范杰,张咏梅,鹿嫣一.卡培他滨单药治疗晚期乳腺癌的临床研究[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2011,18(5):441-443. 被引量:7
  • 3Veyret C,Levy C,Chollet P,et al.Inflammatory breast cancer outcome with epirubicin-basedinduction and maintenance chemotherapy:Ten-year results from the French Adjuvant Study Group GETIS 02 Trial[J].Cancer,2006,107(11):2535-2544.
  • 4Gennari A,Stockler M,Puntoni M,et al.Duration of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer:A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials[J].J Clin Oncol,2011,29(16):2144-2149.
  • 5Park YH,Jung KH,Im SA,et al.Phase Ⅲ,multicenter,randomized trial of maintenance chemotherapy versus observation in patients with metastatic breast cancer after achieving disease control with six cycles of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel as first-linechemotherapy:KCSG-BR07-02[J].J Clin Oncol,2013,31(14):1732-1739.
  • 6王楠,代醒,王留兴.长春瑞滨联合希罗达对蒽环类/紫杉类治疗后复发转移性乳腺癌的疗效观察[J].肿瘤防治研究,2013,40(7):698-701. 被引量:5
  • 7左丽,徐迎春,陶莉,张凤春.长春瑞滨联合希罗达治疗蒽环类和紫杉类耐药的晚期乳腺癌临床分析[J].中国肿瘤临床,2012,29(19):1443-1445. 被引量:8
  • 8Pallis AG,Boukovinas I,Ardavanis A,et al.A multicenter randomized phase Ⅲ trial of vinorelbine/gemcitabine doublet versus capecitabine monotherapy in anthracycline-and taxane-pretreated women with metastatic breast cancer[J].Ann Oncol,2012,23(5):1164-1169.
  • 9Kamal AH,Camacho F,Anderson R,et al.Similar survival with single-agent capecitabine or taxane in first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer[J].Breast Cancer Res Treat,2012,134(1):371-378.
  • 10Huang H,Jiang Z,Wang T,et al.Single-agent capecitabine maintenance therapy after response to capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer[J].Anticancer Drugs,2012,23(7):718-723.

二级参考文献33

  • 1Mariade F,Gilberto Amorim,Roberto Arcuri,et al.A phaseⅡstudy of second-Line neoadjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabineand radiation therapy for anthracycline-resistant locally advancedbreast cancer[J].Am J Clin Oncol,2007,30(1):78-81.
  • 2Fumoleau P,Largillier R,Clippe C,et al.Multicentre,phaseⅡstudy evaluating capecitabine monotherapy in patients withanthracycline-and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer[J].Eur J Cancer,2004,40(4):536-542.
  • 3Gridelli C,Perrone F,Cigolar S,et al.The MILES(multicenteritalian lung cancer in the elderly study)phaseⅢtrial:gemcitabine+vinorelbine vs vinorelbine vs gemcitabine in elder advancednon-small cell lung patient[C].Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol,2001,20:308a.
  • 4Blum JL, Jones SE, Buzdar AU, et al. Multicenter phase Ⅱ study of capecitabine in paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer.J Clin Oncol, 1999,17:485-493.
  • 5Talbot DC, Moiseyenko V, Van Belle S, et al. Randomised, phase Ⅱ trial comparing oral capecitabine (Xeloda) with paclitaxel in patients with metastatic/advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines. Br J Cancer, 2002,86:1367-1372.
  • 6Blum JL, Dieras V, Lo Russo PM, et al. Multicenter, Phase Ⅱ study of capecitabine in taxane-pretreated metastatic breast carcinoma patients. Cancer, 2001,92:1759-1768.
  • 7Reichardt P, Von Minckwitz G, Thuss-Patience PC, et al. Multicenter phase Ⅱ study of oral capecitabine (Xeloda('')) in patients with metastatic breast cancer relapsing after treatment with a taxane-containing therapy. Ann Oncol, 2003,14:1227-1233.
  • 8Abushullaih S, Saad ED, Munsell M, et al. Incidence and severity of hand-foot syndrome in colorectal cancer patients treated with capecita-bine: a single-institution experience. Cancer Invest, 2002,20:3-10.
  • 9Lin E, Morris JS, Ayers GD. Effect of celecoxib on capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome and antitumor activity. Oncology, 2002,16:31-37.
  • 10McMurrough J, McLeod HL. Analysis of the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase polymorphism in a British population. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 1996,41:425-427.

共引文献71

同被引文献58

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部