期刊文献+

股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗老年人股骨转子间骨折疗效分析 被引量:13

Clinical effect of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation on femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)治疗老年人股骨转子间骨折的疗效. 方法 回顾2007年6月至2012年3月在我院收治的老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者应用PFNA治疗87例,其中稳定骨折47例,不稳定骨折40例. 结果87例患者随访5~14个月,平均7.2个月,院内无死亡.手术时间25 min,术中出血量平均80 ml,下地行走时间5.5d,骨折愈合时间平均为22周,术中复位、术后刀片位置,稳定骨折组较不稳定骨折组好(P<0.0)1). 结论 PFNA是治疗老年患者股骨粗隆间骨折的有效方法之一,手术时间短,术中出血量少,早期下地,无短期并发症. Objective To investigate the clinical effect of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) on femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly.Methods Eighty-seven elderly patients from June 2007 to March 2012,who had femoral intertrochanter fracture and received treatment of PFNA,were enrolled in this study.Patients were comprised by forty seven people with stable fracture and forty people with unstable fracture.Results They were all followed up from 4.5months to 14 months,with the average time of 7.2 months.No death were found in hospital.The operation time was 25 min in average.During operation,losing blood was 80 ml.Ambulation time was 5.5 d,and the fracture healing time was 22 weeks in average.However,there were significant differences in intraoperative resetpostoperative position of the blade between the stable and unstable fracture patients (P<0.01).Conclusions PFNA is one of the effective methods in the treatment of intertrochanter fracture,and it has shorter operation time,less losing blood,earlier ambulation,and hardly has complications.
出处 《中华老年医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第7期772-774,共3页 Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
关键词 股骨骨折 骨折骨定术 髓内 Femoral fractures Fracture fixation, intramedullary
  • 相关文献

同被引文献145

  • 1朱永亮.锁定钢板与股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗股骨近端骨折的疗效比较研究[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(2):36-37. 被引量:1
  • 2黄静宇.动力髋螺钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折并骨质疏松的疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(11):3166-3167. 被引量:5
  • 3夏平光,蔡贤华,王庆,黄卫兵,丁然,李津.股骨近端锁定钢板与股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗AO A3型老年股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(8):2276-2277. 被引量:22
  • 4Hsueh K K,Fang C K,Chen C M,et al.Risk factors in cutout of sliding hip screw in intertrochanteric fractures:an evaluation of 937 patients[J].Int Orthop,2010,34(8):1273.
  • 5Stern R,Lübbeke A,Suva D,et al.Prospective randomised study comparing screw versus helical blade in the treatment of low-energy trochanteric fractures[J].Int Orthop,2011,35(12):1855.
  • 6Gazzotti G,Matino G,Tsatsis C,et al.Causes and treatments of lag screw's cut out after intramedullary nailing osteosinthesis for trochanteric fractures[J].Acta Biomed,2013,85(2):135.
  • 7Yaozeng X,Dechun G,Huilin Y,et al.Comparative study of trochanteric fracture treated with the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation and the third generation of gamma nail[J].Injury,2010,41(12):1234.
  • 8Takigami I,Ohnishi K,Ito Y,et al.Acetabular perforation after medial migration of the helical blade through the femoral head after treatment of an unstable trochanteric fracture with proximal femoral nail antirotation(PFNA):a case report[J].J Orthop Trauma,2011,25(9):e86.
  • 9Liu Y,Tao R,Liu F,et al.Mid-term outcomes after intramedullary fixation of peritrochanteric femoral fractures using the new proximal femoral nail antirotation(PFNA)[J].Injury,2010,41(8):810.
  • 10Wright Russell C, Yacoubian Stephan V, Salzman Garrett A, et al . The extended- short nail system, a novel concept in the management of proximal femur fractures[J]. American Journal of Orthopedics (Belle Mead N J) ,2011,40(12) :630 - 635.

引证文献13

二级引证文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部