期刊文献+

整合CAMVA和BCOP方法检测化妆品的眼刺激性 被引量:11

Integrated CAMVA and BCOP methods to predict eye irritation caused by cosmetics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的组合两种体外替代方法评价化妆品的眼刺激。方法分别采用鸡胚尿囊膜血管试验(CAMVA)、牛角膜浑浊通透试验(BCOP)和Draize兔眼试验对60种化妆品进行测试,并预测眼刺激分类。结果采用CAMVA法可以区分41种无刺激性样品和18种有刺激性样品;采用BCOP法可预测35种无刺激性、21种轻-中刺激性和4种严重刺激性样品;组合CAMVA-BCOP方法可明显提高刺激程度的区分能力,与体内实验分类一致性达98.3%。结论组合CAMVA-BCOP的整合试验策略可用于化妆品的眼刺激评价,其预测范围可覆盖无刺激性到严重刺激性。 Objective To explore the use of integrated two methods in vitro in prediction of eye irritation caused by cosmetics. Method Chorioallantoic membrane vascular assay(CAMVA),bovine corneal opacity and permeability(BCOP) and Draize rabbit eye irritation test were used to determine the predictive potential of eye irritation of 60 kinds of cosmetics. Results CAMVA method was able to distinguish 41 non-irritant samples and 18 irritant samples. BCOP method was able to predict 35 non-irritant samples,21 mild-moderate irritant samples and 4 severe irritant samples.Combination of CAMVA and BCOP methods could obviously improve the identification ability of irritation,and the classification consistency with Draize rabbit eye irritation testing reached 98. 3%. Conclusions The integrated test strategy combined BCOP with CAMVA can be used to appropriately predict ocular irritation of cosmetics,with a prediction range covering non-irritant to severe irritant samples.
出处 《中国比较医学杂志》 CAS 2014年第6期78-82,共5页 Chinese Journal of Comparative Medicine
基金 国家质检总局科研项目(2012IK194)
关键词 化妆品 眼刺激性 替代方法 组合策略 Cosmetics Eye irritation Alternative methods Integrated strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1敖华英,程树军,谈伟君.不同哺乳动物红细胞溶血替代眼刺激实验的比较[J].中国组织工程研究,2012,16(12):2163-2166. 被引量:13
  • 2程树军;焦红.实验动物替代方法原理与应用[M]北京:科学出版社,2010285-304.
  • 3EPA BRD-Final Report. Background review document of an in vitro approach for EPA toxicity labeling of anti-microbial cleaning products:EPA toxicity labeling background review document[R].USA:EPA,2009.
  • 4Bagley DM,Waters D,Kong BM. Development of a 10-day chorioallantoic membrane vascular assay as an alternative to the Draize rabbit eye irritation test[J].Food and Chemical Toxicology,1994,(12):1155-1160.
  • 5OECD. OECD guideline for testing of chemicals No.437:Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test method for identifying i) Chemicals inducing serious eye damage and ii) Chemicals not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage[S].OECD Paris,2013.1-27.
  • 6Bagley DM,Cerven D,Harbell J. Assessment of the chorioallantoic membrane vascular assay (CAMVA) in the COLIPA in vitro eye irritation validation study[J].TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO,1999,(02):285-293.
  • 7Daniel MB,Perveen YR,Betty MK. Evaluation of the vascular components of the chorioallantoic membrane assay as a model for eye irritation potential:II[J].Cutan Ocular Toxicol,1991,(1-2):105-113.
  • 8Cameron DM,Donahue DA,Costion GE. Confirmation of in vitro and clinical safety assessment of behentrimonium chloride-containing leave-on body lotions using post-marketing adverse event data[J].TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO,2013,(08):2203-2212.
  • 9ICCVAM. Test Method Evaluation Repor:In Vitro Ocular Toxicity Test Methods for Identifying Ocular Severe Irritants and Corrosives.Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) and the National Toxicology Program (NTP) Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM)[R].NIH Publication,2007.
  • 10Donahue DA,Kaufman LE,Avalos J. Survey of ocular irritation predictive capacity using chorioallantoic membrane vascular assay (CAMVA) and bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) test historical data for 319 personal care products over fourteen years[J].TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO,2011,(02):563-572.

二级参考文献31

  • 1廖艳,王雪,张立实,李冠民,张宝旭.血红蛋白变性试验替代眼刺激试验的实验研究[J].四川大学学报(医学版),2004,35(5):654-657. 被引量:2
  • 2Van den Berghe C,Guillet MC,Compan D.Performance ofporcine corneal opacity and permeability assay to predict eyeirritation for water-soluble cosmetic ingredients[J].Toxicol InVitro.2005,19(6):823-30.
  • 3Creton S,Dewhurst IC,Earl LK,et al.Acute toxicity testing ofchemicals-Opportunities to avoid redundant testing and usealternative approaches[J].Crit Rev Toxicol,2010,40(1):50-83.
  • 4Jester JV, Ling J, Harbell J, et al. Measuring depth of injury (DOI) in an isolated rabbit eye irritation test (1RE) using biomarkers of cell death and viability[ J]. Toxicol In Vitro,2010, 24(2) :597 -604.
  • 5Budai P, Lehel J, Tavaszi J,et al. HET-CAM test for determining the possible eye irritancy of pesticides [ J ]. Aeta Vet Hung, 2010,58(3) :369 -77.
  • 6Joss C, Marie HG, Damien L,et al. In vitro assessment of eye irritancy using the Reconstructed Human Corneal Epithelial SkinEthic? HCE model: Application to 435 substances from consumer products industry [ J ]. Toxicology in Vitro Volume, 2010.24, (2) :523 -537.
  • 7Kaluzny Y,Argembeau-Thornton L,Kandarova H,et al.Expanded utilization of the EpiOcularTM human corneal tissuemodel for ocular irritation testing.Poster presentation SOT,2008.USA.
  • 8Alves EN,Presgrave Rde F,Presgrave OA,et al.Areassessment of the in vitro RBC haemolysis assay withdefibrinated sheep blood for the determination of the ocularirritation potential of cosmetic products:comparison with the invivo Draize rabbit test[J].Altern Lab Anim,2008,36(3):275-84.
  • 9Seaman CW,Whittingham A,Guest R,et al.An evaluation of acultured human corneal epithelial tissue model for thedetermination of the ocular irritation potential of pharmaceuticalprocess materials[J].Toxicol In Vitro,2010,24(6):1862-70.
  • 10Tsakovska I,Saliner AG,Netzeva T,et al.Evaluation of SARsfor the prediction of eye irritation/corrosion potential:structuralinclusion rules in the BfR decision support system.SAR QSAR.Environ.Res.2007,18(3C4),221-235.

共引文献24

同被引文献61

  • 1杨丽华,王凯峰,周轶平,李玛琳.鸡胚尿囊膜模型血管生成定量指标的研究[J].昆明医学院学报,2004,25(2):21-24. 被引量:18
  • 2程树军,邹志飞,黄韧.化妆品毒性检验壁垒性替代技术的研究进展[J].中国比较医学杂志,2006,16(6):379-382. 被引量:11
  • 3杨光宇,杨颖,杨杏芬,贺锡雯,熊习昆,谢晓萍,谭小华,陈海珍.鸡胚尿囊膜绒毛膜试验替代兔眼刺激试验的研究[J].毒理学杂志,2006,20(6):402-405. 被引量:6
  • 4冯士清,赵华.从使用频率看化妆品防腐剂走势(待续)[J].日用化学品科学,2006,29(11):30-33. 被引量:10
  • 5王友升,朱昱燕,董银卯.化妆品用防腐剂的研究现状及发展趋势[J].日用化学品科学,2007,30(12):15-18. 被引量:32
  • 6OECD. OECD guideline for testing of chemicals No. 437 : Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test method for identifying i ) Chemicals inducing serious eye damage and ii ) Chemicals not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage [ S ]. Paris: OECD,2013:1 -27.
  • 7EPA BRD. Background review document of an in vitro approach for EPA toxicity labeling of Anti - Microbial cleaning products :EPA toxicity labeling background review document [ R]. USA : EPA,2009.
  • 8FURUKAWA M, SAKAKIBARA T, ITOH K, et al. Histopathological evaluation of the ocular - irritation potential of shampoos, make - up removers and cleansing foams in the bovine corneal opacity and permeability assay [J ]. Toxicol Patho1,2015,28 (4) :243 - 248.
  • 9NIESSEN C. Tight junctions/adherens junctions: basic structure and function [J]. Invest Dermatol,2007,127( 11 ) :2525 -2532.
  • 10SCOTT L, ESKES C, HOFFMANN S, et al. A proposed eye irritation testing strategy to reduce and replace in vivo studies using Bottom - Up and Top - Down approaches [ J ]. Toxicol in Vitro, 2010,24 ( 1 ) : 1-9.

引证文献11

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部