期刊文献+

目标导向与员工创造力的关系研究——有调节的中介效应分析 被引量:7

A Study on the Relationship between Goal Orientation and Employee Creativity——A Moderated Mediator Effect Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 知识型员工的创造力对于组织提升绩效和竞争优势有着重要作用。现有研究主要从支持性管理等方面来考察如何促进员工创造力的。由于个体特征和环境因素能交互影响创造力绩效,基于创造力组成理论,本文探讨知识型员工不同的目标导向对创造力绩效的影响机制,以及在这一过程中知识共享和任务复杂性所起到的作用。为此,本文构建了一个有调节的中介效应模型,并基于244份不同行业知识型员工的主管—员工配对问卷,实证发现学习目标导向对员工创造力有着显著的正向影响,而绩效目标导向与员工创造力负相关;同时,知识共享在学习目标导向和员工创造力的关系中起到了中介作用;从任务特征出发,结论还支持了任务复杂性会正向调节这一中介作用。我们并没有发现绩效目标导向和知识共享的相关性,以及任务复杂性对二者关系的调节作用。文章最后给出了企业的实践对策和未来研究的方向。 The creativity of knowledge workers plays an important role in improving organizations performance and competitive advantage. The existing research examines how to promote employee creativity from supportive management and other aspects. Since the individual characteristics and environmental factors can interact creativity performance, based on component model of creativity, this article discusses how the different goal orientation of knowledge workers impact on creativity, as well as the role of knowledge sharing and task complexity. Therefore, this article constructs a moderated mediator model, based on 244 knowledge workers supervisor-employee matching questionnaire from different industries, and we empirically found that learning goal orientation has a significant positive effect on employee creativity, white performance goal orientation negatively correlated with employee creativity. Meanwhile, knowledge sharing plays a mediated role in the relationship between learning goal orienta- tion and employee creativity. Starting from the task characteristics, the conclusion also supports the fact that the task complexi- ty positively moderates this mediated relationship. We haven't found the relevance between performance goal orientation and knowledge sharing, and task complexity has no moderated effect on that one. Finally, we have given the practice of corporate strategy and future direction.
作者 夏瑞卿 杨忠
机构地区 南京大学商学院
出处 《浙江工商大学学报》 CSSCI 2014年第4期104-112,共9页 Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University
基金 国家自然科学基金"团队知识共享跨层次研究:前因 结构与有效性--中国情境文化特征的调节作用"(71272106)
关键词 目标导向 学习目标导向 绩效目标导向 知识共享 任务复杂性 goal orientation learning goal orientation performance goal orientation knowledge sharing task complexity
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献69

  • 1陈祎,吴志明.基于胜任特征模型的知识员工激励[J].中国人力资源开发,2006,23(11):52-54. 被引量:7
  • 2唐炎华,石金涛.我国知识型员工知识转移的动机实证研究[J].管理工程学报,2007,21(1):29-35. 被引量:33
  • 3荣泰生.AMOS与研究方法[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2009—3.
  • 4Van Yperen N W. Task interest and actual performance: The moderating effects of assigned and adopted purpose goals[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003,85:1006-1015.
  • 5Kanter R. When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organi- zations[M] // Staw B M, Cummings L L. Research in org- anizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1988:169- 211.
  • 6Van de Walle D, Cron W L, Slocum J W. The role of goal orientation following performance feedback[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001,86:629-640.
  • 7Watson D. Mood and temperament[M]. New York: Guild- ford Press, 2000.
  • 8Watson D, Clark L A. The nature of affectemotions, moods, traits, and temperaments: Conceptual distinctions and empirical findings[M]// Ekman P, Davidson R J. The nature of emotions. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994:89-93.
  • 9Burke M J, Brief A, George J, et al. Measuring affect at work: Confirmatory analyses of competing mood structures with conceptual linkage to cortical regulatory systems[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1959,57:1091-1102.
  • 10Isen A M. Positive affect and decision making[M]//Lewis M, Haviland J M. Handbook of emotions. New York: Gu- ilford Press,1993:261-277.

共引文献36

同被引文献125

  • 1汪涛,郭锐.商业友谊对关系品质和顾客忠诚的影响之研究[J].商业经济与管理,2006(9):35-41. 被引量:10
  • 2班杜拉.自我效能-控制的实施[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2003:528-550.
  • 3郭小艳,王振宏.积极情绪的概念、功能与意义[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):810-815. 被引量:301
  • 4Dayan M., Elbanna S.. Antecedents of Team Intuition and projects[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2011, 28(1): its Impact on the Success of New Product Development 159-174.
  • 5Dayan M., Benedetto C. A. D.. Team Intuition as a Continuum Construct and New Product Creativity: the Role of Environmental Turbulence, Teamexperience, and Stress[J]. Research Policy, 2011, (40): 276-286.
  • 6Dane E., Pratt M. G.. Exploring Intuition and Its Role in Managerial Decision Making[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(1): 33-54.
  • 7Sadler E., Shefy E.. The Intuitive Executive: Understanding and Applying 'Gut Feel' in Decision-Making[J]. The A- cademy of Management Executive, 2004, 19(4): 76-91.
  • 8Harris S. G.. Organizational Culture and Individual Sensemaking: a Schema-based Perspective[J]. Organization Science, 1994, 5(3): 309-321.
  • 9Hodgkinson G. P., Sadler S. E., Burke L. A., Claxton G., Sparrow P. R.. Intuition in Organizations: Implications for Strategic Management[J]. Long Range Planning, 2009, (42): 277-297.
  • 10Dane E.. Reconsidering the Trade-off between Expertise and Flexibility: a Cognitive Entrenchment Perspective[J]. A- cademy of Management Review, 2010, 35(4): 579-603.

引证文献7

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部