期刊文献+

两种换药方法在拔甲术后的应用效果观察 被引量:1

The observation on the effect of two wound dressing methods after operation of pulling out nail
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨两种换药方法在拔甲术后创面换药中的应用效果。方法将86例拔甲术后的患者随机分为观察组43例和对照组43例,对照组采用传统的换药方法;观察组通过延长拔甲术后患者至48~60 h进行首次换药,并在首次换药时留下一层约2 cm×2 cm凡士林纱,且1周左右用0.02%PP液浸泡使其脱落等换药处理。观察两组在拔甲术后再次换药时是否疼痛、出血以及伤口换药次数、伤口愈合时间等并进行比较。结果观察组在再次换药时是否疼痛、出血以及伤口换药次数、伤口愈合时间等方面明显优于对照组(P〈0.01),差异具有统计学意义。结论对拔甲术后患者实施有针对性的换药处理,可以减轻患者的疼痛,并促进创面愈合。 Objective To iscuss the effect on two kinds of treatment methods in the application of pulling a postoperative wound dress-ing. Methods 86 cases of postoperative patients were randomly divided into observation group 43 patients and control group 43 cases, with control group using traditional dressing methods, while observation group by extending a postoperative patient pull the bandage to 48~60 hours for the first time, and leave when dressing for the first time a layer 2 cm×2 cm vaseline gauze, and a week or so make it fall off in an 0.02% PP liquid such as dressing processing. Then they were observed and compared whether the two groups in a postoperative dressing again pull pain, bleeding and the number of wound dressing, wound healing time. Results When the dressing change again pain, bleeding, and number of the wound dressing, wound healing time in observation group were better than those in control group, with significant difference(P〈0.01). Conclusion It can help ease the pain of patients, and promote wound healing, when using targeted treatment processing to pull out a postoperative patients.
出处 《当代护士(下旬刊)》 2014年第8期44-45,共2页 Modern Nurse
关键词 甲沟炎 拔甲术 换药法 Paronychia Operation of pulling out nail Wound dressing
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献32

  • 1汤苏阳,李春伶,罗晓英,杨洋,李冬梅.负压引流对人慢性创面愈合过程中细胞增生活性的影响[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(2):146-147. 被引量:54
  • 2李金清,陈绍宗,李学拥,李望舟,许龙顺,李跃军.封闭负压引流技术对促进猪皮肤软组织创面愈合的影响☆[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(10):110-111. 被引量:46
  • 3廖建中,罗永湘.白芨胶载HMW-NGF促进伤口愈合的实验研究[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,1996,10(3):142-145. 被引量:63
  • 4黄澄如.尿道下裂治疗现状[J].中华小儿外科杂志,1997,18(1):1-2. 被引量:87
  • 5Moues CM,Vos MC,van den Bemd GJ,et al.Bacterial load in relationto vacuum-assisted closure wound therapy:a prospective randomized tri-al[J].Wound Repair Regen,2004,12(1):11-17.
  • 6David GA,Lawrence AL.Negative pressure wound therapy after partialdiabetic foot amputation:a multicentre,randomised controlled trial[J].Lancet,2005,366(9498):1704-1710.
  • 7Peter A,Blume JW,Wyatt P,et al.Comparison of negative pressurewound therapy using vacuum-assited clousure with advanced moistwound therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers:a multicenterrandomized controlled trial[J].Diabetes Care,2008,31(4):631-636.
  • 8World Union of Wound Healing Societies(WUWHS).Vacuum-assisted closure:recommendations for use.A consensus document[M].London:MEP Ltd,2008.
  • 9Sibbald RG,Mahoney J.The V.A.C therapy Canadian Consensus Group.A consensus report on the use of vacuum-assisted closure in chronic,difficult-to-heal wounds[J].Ostomy Wound Manage,2003,49(11):52-66.
  • 10Keryln C.Wound Care Manual[M].Osborne Park,Australia:Silver Chain Foundation,2005:13-15,94-102.

共引文献152

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部