期刊文献+

USCOM在严重多发伤患者中心脏搏出量测量中的应用 被引量:4

Reliability of non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output measurement in measurement of strtoke volume in patients with severe multiple trauma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨无创超声心输出量测定(uscOM)应用于严重多发伤患者的可靠性。方法急诊ICU的12例严重多发伤患者同时进行脉搏波形指示的连续心输出量(PiCCO)监测和USCOM监测,对比两种方法测得的每搏输出量(SV)这一血流动力学核心指标上的差异。结果12例患者中共有10例获得满意的血流超声多普勒影像,另2例慢性阻塞性肺疾病的患者因无法获得满意的超声结果而放弃。USCOM与PiCCO监测所得到的SV分别为(81.37±16.98)ml和(80.33±15.81)ml,USCOM测得的最小SV为40ml,最大SV为113ml,而PiCCO测得的最小SV为59ml,最大SV为106ml。相关分析显示,两组指标存在明显的相关性(Pearson相关系数0.855,P〈0.0001)。17次USCOM测得的SV高于PiCCO,这些患者的红细胞分钟距离(MD)为(25.53±4.43)m/min;13次USCOM测得的SV低于PiCCO测得的SV,其MD为(21.85±3.80)m/min,二者差别明显。USCOM得到数据时间为(3.26±0.91)min,明显低于PiCCO的时间(8.97±1.1)min,P〈0.05。结论无创超声心输出量测定准确、快速、安全,无创,适合在ICU严重多发伤患者中应用,但需注意在高动力循环患者存在高估SV的可能。 Objective To investigate the reliability of non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output measurement (USCOM) in monitoring stroke volume (SV) in patients with severe multiple trauma. Methods Twelve patients with severe multiple trauma treated in emergency ICU underwent USCOM and pulse indicated continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) monitoring simuhaneoiusly. The paired values of SV measured by these 2 techniques were compared. Results Satisfying blood flow Doppler images were obtained from 10 out of the 12 patients. , and the other 2 patients, with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, were excluded from the study due to the failure to obtain acceptable ultrasound signals. Thirty paired SV measurements were obtained totally. The SV value obtained by USCOM wase (81.37 ± 16.98) ml and that by PiCCO was (80.33 ± 15.81) ml. The SV values of 17 case-times of USCOM, with a minute distance (MD) of red cells of 25.53±4.43, were significantly higher than those by PiCCO, and the SV value of 13 case-times of USCOM, with a red cell MD of 21.85±3.80, was significantly lower than that by PiCCO. The time needed to get data was (3.26±0.91) rain for USCOM, significantly shorter than that for the PiCCO technique (P 〈0.0001). Conclusion USCOM is accurate, fast, safe, non-luvasive , and suitable for use in ICU patients with severe multiple trauma. SV would be oveivalued in patients with hyperdynamtie circulatory state.
出处 《中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志》 2014年第7期586-589,597,共5页 China Journal of Emergency Resuscitation and Disaster Medicine
基金 福建省卫生厅青年课题(2011-2-70)
关键词 每搏输出量 多普勒超声 严重多发伤 Stroke volume Doppler ultrasound Severe multiple trauma
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1陈德昌.多发伤救治面临的挑战[J].中华创伤杂志,2004,20(1):4-6. 被引量:121
  • 2Lichtwarck-Aschoff M,Zeravik J,Pfeiffer UJ.Intrathoracic blood volume accurately reflects circulatory volume status in critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation.Intensive Care Med,1992,18(3):142-147.
  • 3Litton E,Morgan M.The PiCCO monitor:a review.Anaesth Intensive Care.2012,40(3):393-409.
  • 4Gassanov N,Caglayan E,Nia A,et al.Hemodynamic monitoring in the intensive care unit:pulmonary artery catheter versus PiCCO.Dtsch Med Wochensehr,2011,136(8):376-380.
  • 5Arora D,Chand R,Mehta Y,et al.Cardiac output estimation 'after off pump corollary artery bypass:a comparison of two different techniques.Ann Card Anaesth,2007,10(2):132-136.
  • 6刘琼,余珍珠,刘晓红,等.应用USCOM及超声多普勒监测正常足月新生儿的左心输出量研究.中国急救医学,2007,14(z1):34-35.
  • 7Wong LS,Yong BH,Young KK,et al.Comparison of USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor with pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution in patients undergoing liver transplantation.Liver Transpl,2008,14(7):1038-1043.
  • 8Sophia H,Hans-Joachim S,Nina S,et al.Cardiac output measurements in septic patients:comparing the accuracy of USCOM to PiCCO.Critical Care Research and Practice,2012,1-5.
  • 9张继如,张焰.超声心输出量监测仪用于心输出量测定的研究进展和评价[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2010,31(1):77-79. 被引量:12
  • 10Nidorf SM,Picard MH,Triulzi MO,et al.New perspectives in the assessment of cardiac chamber dimensions during development and adultbood.J Am Coll Cardiol,1992,19(5):983-988.

二级参考文献23

  • 1刘琮 余珍珠 刘晓红 等.应用USCOM及超声多普勒监测正常足月新生儿的左心输出量研究.中国小儿急救医学,2007,14.
  • 2Sandham JD, Hull RD, Brant RF, et al. A randomized,controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. N Engl J Med, 2003, 348(1): 5-14.
  • 3Connors AF Jr, Speroff T, Dawson NV, et ah The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. JAMA, 1996, 276( 11 ) : 889-897.
  • 4Knirseh W, Kretschmar O, Tomaske M, et al. Cardiac output measurement in children: comparison of the Utrasound Cardiac Output Monitor with thermodilution cardiac output measurement. Intensive Care Med, 2008, 34(6): 1060-1064.
  • 5Tan HL, Pinder M, Parsons R, et al. Clinical evaluation of USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in cardiac surgical patients in intensive care unit. Br J Anaesth, 2005, 94(3): 287-291.
  • 6van Lelyvele-Haas LE, van Zanten AR,Borm GF, et al. Clinical validation of the non-invasive cardiac output monitor USCOM-1A in critically ill patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2008, 25(11 ) : 917-924.
  • 7Wong LS, Yong BH, Young KK, et al. Comparison of USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor with puhnomary artery catheter thermodilution in patients undergoing liver transplantation. LiverTranspl, 2008, 14(7): 1038-1043.
  • 8Su BC, Yu HP, Yang MVV, et al. Reliability of a new ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in recipients of living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl, 2008, 14(7): 1029-1037.
  • 9Chand R, Mehta Y, Trehan N. Cardiac output estimation with a new Doppler device after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2006, 20(3) : 315-319.
  • 10Arora D,Chand R,Mehta Y,et al. Cardiac output estimation after off-pump coronary artery bypass: a comparison of two different techniques. Ann Card Anaesth, 2007, 10(2): 132-136.

共引文献131

同被引文献55

  • 1陈俊,赵劭懂,李军,葛许华,王晓榕,缪红军,江涛,喻文亮.无创心输出量监测(USCOM)在危重病患儿中的应用价值[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(36):149-149. 被引量:2
  • 2Abella B S, Sandbo N, Vassilatos P, et al. Chest compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation are suboptimal: a prospective study during in hospital cardiac angst [ J]. Circulation, 2005, 111 (4): 428-434.
  • 3Herlitz J, B~mg A, Als6n B, et al. Characteristics and outcome among patients suffering from in hospital cardiac arrest in relation to the interal between collapse and start of CPR [J]. Resuscitation, 2002, 53 (1): 21-27.
  • 4Li H,Critchley L A H,Zhang J,et al.Does using two Doppler cardiac output monitors in tandem provide a reliable trend line of changes for validation studies?[J].J clin monit comp,2015,53(4):354-355.
  • 5Chong S W,Peyton P J.A meta-analysis of the accuracy and precision of the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor(USCOM)[J].Anaesthesia,2012,67(11):1266-1271.
  • 6Dey I,Sprivulis P.Emergency physicians can reliably assess emergency department patient cardiac output using the USCOM continuous wave Doppler cardiac output monitor[J].Emergency Medicine Australasia,2005,17(3):193-199.
  • 7Duchateau F X,Gauss T,Burnod A,et al.Feasibility of cardiac output estimation by ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring in the prehospital setting[J].European Journal of Emergency Medicine,2011,18(6):357-359.
  • 8Middleton P M,Davies S R.Noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in the emergency department[J].Current opinion in critical care,2011,17(4):342-350.
  • 9褚铭肄,李春香,刘妮妮,等.超声心排血量监护仪监测左右心心排血量的相关性研究[J].中国全科医学,2009,12(5):424-425.
  • 10Siu L,Tucker A,Manikappa S K,et al.Does patient position influence Doppler signal quality from the USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor?[J].Anesthesia&Analgesia,2008,106(6):1798-1802.

引证文献4

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部