传统手术与微创手术治疗小儿疝气的效果比较

目的：探究并分析传统手术与微创手术治疗小儿疝气的效果。方法回顾性分析2012年1月～2013年1月江西省上饶市中医院收治的100例经传统手术治疗的疝气患儿和120例经微创手术治疗的疝气患儿的临床资料，观察并比较2组患儿术后疗效的一般情况及阴囊肿胀等其余并发症的发生情况。结果观察组患儿术后手术时间、平均出血量、自主活动时间等一般情况均明显少于对照组，且微创组患儿术后无需住院，恢复较快；观察组患儿术后并发症的总发生率分别为15.00%，而对照组为53.00%，观察组明显低于对照组，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论微创手术治疗较传统手术治疗而言，具有术中出血少、损伤小、术后恢复较快、并发症少等优点，值得在临床上广泛应用。

Objective To study and analyze effects of traditional surgery and minimally invasive surgery in treating infantile hernia. Methods The clinical data of 100 patients with infantile hernia who received traditional surgical treatment and 120 patients with infantile hernia who received minimally invasive surgical treatment in the hospital from January 2012 to January 2013, were analyzed retrospectively, and general curative effect of patients in the two group and complications after the surgery such as scrotum swelling, were observed and compared. Results The operation time, average bleeding quantity and independent activity time and other aspects of the patients in the observation group after the surgery were signiifcantly less than that of patients in the control group;Patients who received the minimally invasive surgery did not need the hospitalization and they recovered faster;The total incidence of postoperative complications for patients in the observation group was 15.00%, which was obviously lower than that of control group observation group （53.00%）, （P〈0.05） which was of statistical signiifcance. Conclusion Compared with traditional surgery, minimally invasive surgery has many advantages such as less bleeding in the surgery, less hurt, faster postoperative recovery and fewer complications and so on, which deserves to be applied widely in the clinic.