期刊文献+

乌司他丁联合胸腺肽α1对脓毒症患者免疫调理的临床疗效分析 被引量:7

To analyze the clinical effects of ulinastatin and thymosinα1on immune-modulation in septic patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:分析乌司他丁联合胸腺肽α1对脓毒症患者免疫调理的临床疗效。方法:将符合入选标准的172例脓毒症患者随机分为对照组和治疗组。对照组88例,采用SSC经典治疗;治疗组84例,在SSC经典治疗的基础上加用乌司他丁和胸腺肽α1联合治疗。用酶联免疫吸附法(ELASA)检测2组患者治疗前后血清IL-6、IL-10、TNF-α,用流式细胞仪检测2组患者治疗前后外周静脉血CD14+单核细胞人类白细胞抗原-DR(HLA-DR)表达率。观察2组患者APACHEⅡ评分、28d病死率、MODS发生率、机械通气时间、感染病程和ICU住院天数及治疗前后上述免疫指标的变化。结果:①2组患者治疗前各指标差异均无统计学意义;②治疗组治疗后外周静脉血HLA-DR表达率明显升高,血清IL-6、IL-10、TNF-α含量明显降低,且与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);③治疗组APACHEⅡ评分明显下降,且与对照组比较差异有统计学意义,28d病死率、MODS发生率、机械通气时间明显低于对照组(P<0.05),但2组患者感染病程及ICU住院天数比较差异无统计学意义。结论:乌司他丁联合胸腺肽α1的免疫调节治疗能显著改善脓毒症患者免疫失衡状态,明显改善APACHEⅡ评分,并降低28d病死率、MODS发生率及减少机械通气时间,但对感染病程及ICU住院天数则无明显影响。 Objective:To analyze the clinical effects of immuno-modulatory therapy with ulinastatin and thymosin α1 on patients with sepsis. Method: 172 septic patients admitted to Hubei ZhongShan Hospital intensive care unit (ICU) during 2010.02-2013.4 were included, and they were randomly divided into treatment group(84 cases) and control group(88 cases). The patients in control group were given regular conventional treatment according to Surviving Sepsis Campaign(SSC). The treatment group received conventional treatment plus immuno-modulation therapy including ulinastatin and thymosin al. The levels serum IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α of peripheral blood were detected by ELISA. Peripheral blood CD14^+ monocyte human leucoeyte antigen DR(HLA-DR) expression were assessed with flow cytometer. General demographics were observed,and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II)scores were recorded. Duration of infection and mechanical ventilation,length of ICU stay, rate of development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome(MODS) and mortality rate on 28 days were observed. Result: ①Before treatment,there was no difference in all biomarkers between the two groups. ②After treatment, peripheral blood CD14+ monoeyte, HLA-DR expression increased significantly in the treatment group(P〈0.05), while serum IL-6,IL-10and TNF-α levels reduced remarkably(P〈0.05). The values showed significant differences compared with those of control group(P〈0.05). ③APACHE Ⅱ scores reduced remarkably(P〈0.05). The values showed significant differences compared with those of control group(P〈0.05). The MODS development rate in the treatment group was much lower than that of control group(P〈0.05), and the length of use of mechanical ventilation was significantly reduced (P〈0.05). There was no difference in the infection duration and length of ICU stay(P〉0.05). The mortality rate on 28 days in the treatment group was much lower than that in control group. Conclusion:The immuno-modulation therapy of ulinastatin and thymosin α1 can remarkably improve the duration of mechanical ventilation, the development rate of MODS and the mortality rate on 28 days in patients with sepsis,probably due to its effect in ameliorating the immuno-imbalance state. However, the duration of infection and length of ICU stay are not effeeted.
作者 戴丽星 何静
出处 《临床急诊杂志》 CAS 2014年第7期420-422,425,共4页 Journal of Clinical Emergency
关键词 乌司他丁 胸腺肽Α1 脓毒症 免疫调理 ulinastatin thymosin α1 sepsis immunomodulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献64

共引文献135

同被引文献54

  • 1无.脓毒症的定义、诊断标准、中医证候诊断要点及说明(草案)[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2007,16(8):797-798. 被引量:269
  • 2Burbelo P D, Seam N, Groot S, et al. Rapid induction of autoantibodies during ARDS and septic shock[J]. J Transl Med,2010,8:97-97.
  • 3Nagase T,Uozumi N, Ishii S, et al. Acute lung injury by sepsis and acid aspiration, a key role for cytosolie phospholipase A2[-J]. Nat Immunol, 2000,1:42- 46.
  • 4ARDS Definition Task Fome,Ranieri V M, Rubenfeld G D, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition[J-l. JAMA, 2012,307 : 2526 - 2533.
  • 5Delia Rocca G,Costa M G,Pompei L,et al. Continuous and internlittent cardiac output measurement: pulmo- nary artery catheter versus aortic transpulmonary technique[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2002,88 : 350- 356.
  • 6Pinsky M R,Vincent J L. Let us use the pulmonary artery catheter correctly and only when we need it[J]. Crit Care Med,2005,33:ll19-1122.
  • 7Summers R L, Kolb J C, Woodward L H. Diagnostic uses for thoracic electrical bioimpendanee in the emer- gency department : clinical case series[-J]. Eur J Emerg Med,1999,6:193- 199.
  • 8Peacock W F,Summers R L, Vogel J, et al. Impact of impedance Cardiography on diagnosis and therapy of emergent dyspnea: the ED-IMPACT trial [J-]. Acad Emerg Med, 2006,13 : 365- 371.
  • 9Gilbert J, Lazio L. Managing congestive heart failure with Thoracieelectrical bioimpedancel-J]. AACN ClinIssues, 1999,10:400-405.
  • 10Ishibe S, Peixoto A J. Methods of assessment of vol- ume status and intercompartmental fluid shift in he- modialysis patients: implications in clinical practice :-J-]. Semin Dial, 2004,17 : 37 - 43.

引证文献7

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部