摘要
目的:探讨针刺配合放血、耳针治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效和治疗机理。方法:将180例患者随机分为两组,治疗组和对照组,每组90例,治疗组采用针刺配合放血、耳针治疗,体穴取L3~L5夹脊为主;放血穴位取L3~L5棘突下、委中或阳陵泉、阿是穴;耳穴取耳尖、内分泌、肾上腺、腰椎等。对照组采用单纯针刺治疗,与治疗组中针刺疗法相同。连续治疗2个疗程进行疗效对比,并观察两组治疗前后症状积分的变化。结果:治疗组总有效率94.44%,对照组为80%,差别有统计学意义(P<0.05),治疗后两组临床症状积分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:针刺配合放血、耳针对腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效优于单纯针刺疗法。
Objective:To explore the clinically therapeutic effect and mechanisms of acupuncture combined with bleeding and auricular acupuncture for treating the prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc .Methods:180 ca-ses were randomly divided into two groups , a treatment group and a control group ,with 90 cases in each group . The treatment group was treated with acupuncture associated with pricking blood and auricular acupuncture , with body points lumbar Jiaji (EX-B2) mainly from 3 to 5, bleeding points that the lower of spinous process from the 3rd lumbar vertebra to the 5th lumbar vertebra,Weizhong(BL40) or Yanglingquan(GB34),A shi acu-points , and auricular points ear apex , endocrine , adrenal gland , lumbar were selected .The control group was treated with simple acupuncture that was the same as acupuncture therapy in the treatment group .The therapeu-tic effect was recorded after two courses of continuous treatment , and clinical symptom scores in both groups were observed before and after treatment .Results:The total effective rates in the treatment group and the con-trol group were 94 .44% and 80%, respectively .And there was a significant difference between two groups ( P〈0 .05 ) .After treatment , clinical symptom scores in both groups had a significant difference ( P〈0 .05 ) . Conclusion:The clinical efficacy of acupuncture combined with bleeding and auricular acupuncture is better than that of simple acupuncture on prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc .
出处
《针灸临床杂志》
2014年第7期32-35,共4页
Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion
关键词
针刺疗法
放血疗法
耳针
腰椎间盘突出症
夹脊穴
Acupuncture therapy
Bleeding therapy
Auricular acupuncture
Lumbar disc herniation
Jiaji ( EX-B2) point