期刊文献+

长处和困难问卷学生版与父母版的河南常模评定 被引量:6

Norms of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (the edition for students, and the edition for parents) in children of Henan province
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 建立长处和困难问卷学生版、父母版的河南常模,并进行信、效度检验.方法 对河南省6个市的6所城市中小学和8所农村中小学的1 362名7~15岁的学生、820名父亲或母亲分别进行长处和困难问卷(SDQ)学生版、父母版的评定,并均抽取其中的100例隔两周重测,同时在医院门诊收集焦虑、抑郁障碍、品行障碍、注意缺陷多动障碍患者分别测评.一致性检测包括项目内容异质性和重测信度.效度检测包括结构效度和区分效度.建立划界常模.结果 信度检验中Cronbach's α系数学生版为0.589~0.712,父母版为0.611~0.702;重测相关系数学生版r=0.418~0.722,P=0.00,父母版r=0.564~0.772,P=0.00;内容效度中相关系数学生版r=0.327~0.696,P=0.00,父母版r=0.482~0.774,P=0.00;病例组与常模组得分比较同伴关系、亲社会化因子差异无统计学意义,其余病例组均高于常模组(t=2.179~6.944,P<0.05);划界常模分学生版情绪问题为4分,多动注意问题5分,品行问题4分,父母版情绪问题为4分,多动注意问题6分,品行问题3分,大于划界分即可能有相应的问题.结论 SDQ学生版、父母版适用于对河南青少年儿童的评估,并可用于情绪、注意多动、品行等问题的筛查. Objective To develop the norm of Children Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ,the edition for students,and for parents) in Henan province and test and investigate the reliability and validity of the questionnaire.Methods SDQ was administered to 1 362 children aged (10.99± 2.57)y and 820 parents from Henan Province.Retest data was collected from parents and 100 children two weeks later.Data was analyzed to describe normative scores,cut-offs for normal,and abnormal scores.Reliability was assessed from analyzes of internal consistency,inter-rater agreement.Structural validity and discriminate validity were assessed.Results The Cronbach coefficient of the students edition and the parents edition scale respectively was 0.589-0.712 and 0.611-0.702; The reassessed association coefficient was 0.418-0.722,P =0.00,and 0.564-0.772,P =0.00 respectively; the validity test showed that association coefficient was 0.327-0.696,P =0.00,and 0.482-0.774,P =0.00 respectively; content validity t =2.179-6.944,P < 0.05.No different is on peer relationship and prosocietal factor subscale between case and norm group.The demarcation norm of scale respectively was 4 and 4 on emotion subscale,5 and 6 on hyperactivity-inattention subscale,4 and 3 on conduct subscale.Conclusions The students' edition of SDQ and the parents' edition of SDQ are applicable to assess the mental symptoms of children and adolescents in Henan province.
出处 《神经疾病与精神卫生》 2014年第3期232-235,共4页 Journal of Neuroscience and Mental Health
关键词 长处和困难问卷 常模 信度 效度 Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (the edition for students, and the edition for parents) Norm Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献43

共引文献215

同被引文献73

  • 1张晓明,杨红梅.37例问题行为学生的心理干预效果分析[J].中国行为医学科学,2005,14(2):155-155. 被引量:5
  • 2寇建华,杜亚松,夏黎明.儿童长处和困难问卷(父母版)上海常模的信度和效度[J].上海精神医学,2005,17(1):25-28. 被引量:186
  • 3杜亚松,寇建华,王秀玲,夏黎明,邹如皓.长处和困难问卷研究[J].心理科学,2006,29(6):1419-1421. 被引量:81
  • 4戴晓阳.常用心理评估量表手册[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2013:43-47.
  • 5黄志伟.问题学生与学生问题[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2006:32.
  • 6Xu T. Conners Children Behavior Checklist[J]. Shanghai Ar- chive of Psychiatry, 1990,2 Supph46-47.
  • 7Goodman R. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note[J]. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 1997, 38 (5) : 581-586.
  • 8Du Y, Kou J, Coghill D. The validity, reliability and norma- tive scores of the parent, teacher and self report versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in China [J]. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health, 2008,2 (1) : 8.
  • 9van Widenfelt BM, Goedhart AW, Treffers PD, et al. Dutch version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) [J]. Eur Child Adolesct Psychiatry, 2003,12(6) : 281 - 289.
  • 10Simpson GA, Bloom B, Cohen RA, et al. U.S. children with emotional and behavioral difficulties: data from the 2001,2002, and 2003 National Health Interview Surveys[J]. Adv Data, 2005(360) : 1- 13.

引证文献6

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部