期刊文献+

汕头港水质的模糊综合评价 被引量:3

A comprehensive assessment of seawater quality at Shantou Port by fuzzy mathematical model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据2009年4月至2010年3月对汕头港6个断面的连续调查所得数据,以溶解无机氮(DIN)、活性磷酸盐(PO4–P)、溶解氧(DO)、化学需氧量(COD)、硫化物和悬浮物作为海水水质评价指标,应用模糊综合评价法与多元尺度分析法对汕头港水质的时空变化进行评价。结果表明,汕头港全年各断面水质均为Ⅳ类,主要污染因子均是DIN和PO4–P。空间上,海湾西部污染程度明显比东部严重,尤其是西港河口因水动力学条件差污染最为严重。时间上,水质变化无明显季节性变化特征,其中,4月、5月与7月这三个月的水质明显好其他各月。汕头港水质与盐度呈明显的正相关(r=0.644)表明径流输入是汕头港主要污染来源。 Using survey data collected from a successive investigation into the 6 sections of Shantou Port from April 2009 to March 2010, this essay attempts to assess the spatial and temporal distribution and changes of the seawater quality along Shantou Port, with dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN), phosphate, dissolved oxygen (DO), chemical oxygen demand (COD), sulfide and suspended matter as the assessment parameters, and fuzzy mathematical model coupled with multidimensional scaling as the research method. The results show that the seawater quality in each section and month is the Level IV by Chinese Marine Water Quality Standard (GB 3097--1997), and that DIN and phosphate are the major pollutants. In spatial distribution, the water to the west of the bay is more severely polluted than that to the east, especially the zone around Xigang Estuary is the worst because of its poor hydrodynamic condition. In temporal distribution, the seawater quality manifests no significant seasonal differences, and the water quality in April, May and July is distinctly better than the others. The significant positive correction(r=0.644) between seawater quality and salinity indicates that runoff is mainly pollution source.
出处 《生态科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期332-338,共7页 Ecological Science
基金 广东省科技计划项目(2010B031900043 2010B020201015) 国家海洋局海洋公益性行业科研专项项目(201105008-9)
关键词 河口 海水水质 模糊综合评价 多元尺度分析 estuary seawater quality fuzzy comprehensive evaluation multidimensional scaling
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1MCDANIELS T L, GREGORY R S, FIELDS D. Democratizing risk management: Successful public involvement in local water management decisions[J]. Risk Analysis, 1999, 19: 497-510.
  • 2CHANG N B, CHEN H W, NING S K. Identification of river water quality using the fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2001, 63: 293-305.
  • 3SASILKUMAR K, MUJUMDAR P P. Fuzzy optimization model for water quality management of a river system[J]. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 1998, 124(2): 79-88.
  • 4SASILKUMAR K, MUJUMDAR P P. Application of fuzzy probability in water quality management of a river system[J]. International Journal of Systems Science, 2000, 31(5): 575-591.
  • 5LIOU S M, LOS L, HU C Y. Application of two-stage fuzzy set theory to river quality evaluation in Taiwan[J]. Water Research, 2003, 37: 1406-1416.
  • 6何桂芳,袁国明.用模糊数学对珠江口近20a来水质进行综合评价[J].海洋环境科学,2007,26(1):53-57. 被引量:33
  • 7郑琳,崔文林,贾永刚.青岛海洋倾倒区海水水质模糊综合评价[J].海洋环境科学,2007,26(1):38-41. 被引量:30
  • 8潘怡,仵彦卿,叶属峰,范海梅.上海海域水质模糊综合评价[J].海洋环境科学,2009,28(3):283-287. 被引量:17
  • 9王焕松,雷坤,李子成,邓义祥,秦延文.辽东湾海域水体富营养化的模糊综合评价[J].环境科学研究,2010,23(4):413-419. 被引量:50
  • 10陈则实.中国海湾志(第九分册)[M].北京:海洋出版社,1997.

二级参考文献105

共引文献499

同被引文献41

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部