期刊文献+

护士间团结度测评工具中文版信效度研究 被引量:29

The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Colleague Solidarity of Nurses' Scale
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对护士间团结度测评工具——护士间团结量表(Colleague Solidarityof Nurses'Scale,CSNS)进行翻译,并对翻译后的中文版CSNS做信、效度分析。方法采用方便抽样抽取418名天津市三级甲等医院护士进行调查.运用SPSS17.0和AMOS17.0进行统计分析,对原量表进行修改并形成最终量表。结果中文版CSNS的Cronbach’s α系数为0.892,量表重测信度为0.865.内容效度为0.957。各条目与量表总分的相关系数值为0-314—0.671(P〈0.01)。探索性因素分析表明,提取的3个公因子累积方差贡献率为59.071%;验证性一阶和二阶因子分析结果显示,卡方值/自由度(x^2/df)=1.624/0.994、拟合优度指数(GFI)=O.909/0.948、调和拟合优度指数(AGFI)-0.868/0.919、近似误差均方根(RMSEA)-0.051/0.000、正规拟合指数(NFI)=0.887/0.935、比较拟合优度指数(CFI)=0.952/1.000、Tucker-Lewis指数(TLI)=0.936/1.001。结论中文版护士间团结量表具有良好的信度和效度,可作为护士间团结度的测评工具。 Objective To translate the English version of the Colleague Solidarity of Nurses' Scale(CSNS) into Chinese ,and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of CSNS. Methods The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of CSNS were tested among 418 nurses in Tianjin city. Data were analyzed by SPSS 17.0 software and AMOS 17.0 software. Results The Cronbach's α coefficient of the Chinese version of CSNS was 0.892,the test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.865 and the content validity index was 0.957. The correlations of the scores between each item and the total scale were ranged from 0.314 to 0.671(P〈0.01). Three factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis,wich contributed 59.071% of the total variance. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good fit of the model to the data based on various fit indices(Х^2=1.624,GFI=0.909/0.948,AGFI=0.868/ 0.919,RMSEA=0.OS1/0.000,NFI=0.887/0.935,CFI=0.952/1.000,TLI=0.936/1.001). Conclusion The Chinese version of CSNS is reliable and valid,and can be used to measure colleague solidarity among nurses.
出处 《中华护理杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第8期919-923,共5页 Chinese Journal of Nursing
关键词 护士 团结 量表 信度 效度 Nurses Solidarity Scale Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Cramm JM,Strating MM,Nieboer AP. The influence of organi- zational characteristics on employee solidarity in the long-term care sector[J]. J Adv Nurs,2013,69(3):526-534.
  • 2Uslusoy EC,Alpar SE.Developing scale for colleague solidarity among nurses in Turkey [J l-Int J Nurs Pract, 2013,19 ( 1 ) : 101- 107.
  • 3Sundin L,Hochwalder J,Bild C,et al.The relationship be- tween different work-related sources of social support and burnout among registered and assistant nurses in Sweden:a questionnaire survey[J].Int J Nurs Stud,2007,44(5):758-769.
  • 4Fasoli DR. The culture of nursing engagement:a historical perspective[J]. Nurs Adm Q ,2010,34( 1 ) :18-29.
  • 5Kamifiski J. Problems of doctor judym's peers[J]. Arch Hist Filoz Med, 2000,63 (3/4) : 146-150.
  • 6Ellenbecker CH,Boylan LN,Samia L. What home heahhcare nurses are saying about their jobs[J]. Home Heatthc Nurse, 2006,24(5) :315-324.
  • 7常涛,廖建桥.团队性绩效考核对知识共享的影响模型研究[J].科研管理,2011,32(1):111-121. 被引量:23
  • 8吴明隆.SPSS统计应用实务[M].北京:中国铁道出版,2001..
  • 9黄春平,刘彦慧,年庆婷,崔颖.护士结构性授权测评工具中文版信效度研究[J].中华护理杂志,2011,46(12):1213-1215. 被引量:33
  • 10Vahedi S,Farrokhi F,Mahdavi A,et al.Exploratory and confir- matory factor analysis of the career decision-making difficul- ties questionnaire[J]. Iran J Psychiatry,2012,7(2):74-81.

二级参考文献73

共引文献183

同被引文献236

引证文献29

二级引证文献545

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部