期刊文献+

差异碳税下企业的最优生产和减排决策研究 被引量:15

Optimal Decision of Enterprise Production and Emission Reduction with Discriminated Carbon Tax Considered
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在对不同减排水平的企业征收差异碳税的基础上,以社会总福利最大化为目标,建立政府主导的Stackelberg博弈模型,研究政府和排放依赖型双寡头企业的决策问题。实证分析表明,征收差异碳税有利于增强减排企业的市场竞争力,激励其进一步加大减排的投入,提高净化率。 On the basis of levying discriminated carbon tax on firms with different emission intensity reduction level, this paper constructs a stackelberg game model to study the decision-making problems of government and duopoly enterprises. The empirical results show that imposing discriminated carbon tax help the enterprise with emission reduction enhance market competitiveness and improve its purification rate.
作者 王坤 赵道致
出处 《软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第8期21-25,共5页 Soft Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71072155)
关键词 差异碳税 社会总福利 STACKELBERG博弈 净化率 discriminated carbon tax total social welfare stackelberg game purification rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1付丽苹,刘爱东.征收碳税对高碳企业转型的激励模型[J].系统工程,2012,30(7):94-98. 被引量:15
  • 2Pigou A C. The Economics of Welfare [ M ]. London: Macmillian, 1952.
  • 3Bernard P H, Jose T. An International Carbon Tax to Combat Glob- al Warming: An Economic and Political Analysis of the European Union Proposal [ J ]. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 1995,54(3) :257 -267.
  • 4Barker T, Baylis S, Madsen P. AUK Carbon/Energy Tax: The Macro- economics Effects[ J ]. Energy Policy ,1993, 21 (3) : 296 - 308.
  • 5Wissema W, Delllink R. Age Analysis of the Impact of a Carbon Energy Tax on the Lrish Economy [ J ]. Ecological Economics, 2007, 61(4) : 671 -683.
  • 6Christoph B, Rutherford T F. Carbon Taxes with Exemptions in an Open Economy : A General Equilibrium Analysis of the German Tax Initiative [ J ]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Manage- ment,2007,32 (2): 189 - 203.
  • 7Wolfram F R, Kerstin S. Energy Taxation : Reasons for Discriminat- ing in Favor of the Production Sector [ J ]. European Economic Re- view,2003,47(3) :461 -476.
  • 8Erin Baker, Ekundayo Shittu. Profit - maximizing R&D in Re- sponse to a Random Carbon Tax[ J]. Resource and Energy Econom- ics,2006(28) ,160 - 180.
  • 9Goulder L, Mathai K. Optimal CO2 Abatement in the Presence of Induced Technical Change [J]. Journal of Environmental Econom- ics and Management,2000( 39 ) : 1 - 38.
  • 10Buonanno P, Carraro C, Galeotti M. Endogenous Induced Techni- cal Change and the Costs of Kyoto [J]. Resource and Energy Eco- nomics,2003(25) : 11 - 34.

二级参考文献38

  • 1吴静,王铮,吴兵.石油价格上涨对中国经济的冲击——可计算一般均衡模型分析[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2005,22(2):69-75. 被引量:15
  • 2Oberthur S. , Ott, H. E.. The Kyoto Protocol:International Climate Policy for the 21st Century [M]. Berlin/ Heidelberg/New York, Springer, 1999.
  • 3香港环境保护署.2008空气污染管理(修订)条例草案[Z].香港,2008,http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr07-08/chinese/bills/brief/b26_brf.pdf.
  • 4魏一鸣,等.中国能源报告(2008):碳排放研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2008:134.
  • 5Monica, B. , Frabcesco, G.. Electricity pricing under "carbon emissions trading": A dominant firm with competitive fringe model [J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(8) : 4200-4220.
  • 6Kara, M. , et al. The impacts of EU CO2 emissions trading on electricity markets and electricity consumers in Finland [J]. Energy Economics, 2008, 30(2) : 193-211.
  • 7Tsikalakis, A.G., Hatziargyriou, N.D.. Environmental benefits of distributed generation with and without emissions trading [J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(6): 3395-3409.
  • 8Damien, D. , Philippe, Q.. European emission trading scheme and competitiveness: a case study on the iron and steel industry [J]. Energy Economics, 2007, 30 (4) : 2009-2027.
  • 9Rehdanz, K. , Tol, R. S. J.. Unilateral Regulation of Bilateral Trade in Greenhouse Gas Emission Permits [J]. Ecological Economics, 2005, 54(4): 397-416.
  • 10Bernard, A. , Haurie, A. , Vielle, M. , Viguier, L.. A two-level dynamic game of carbon emission trading between Russia, China, and Annex B countries [J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2007, 32(6): 1830-1856.

共引文献306

同被引文献134

  • 1龙英锋,丁鹤.英国气候变化税与碳排放权交易综合运用的经验及借鉴[J].税务研究,2020(1):82-85. 被引量:12
  • 2Dinah T. Policy options for reducing CO2 emissions [M]. Government Printing Office, 2008.
  • 3Chen Xi, Benjaafar S, Elomri A. The carbon-constrained EOQ [J]. Operations Research Letters, 2013, 41 (2): 172-179.
  • 4Song Jingpu, Leng Mingming. Analysis of the single-period problem under carbon emissions policies [M]. Handbook of Newsvendor Problems, Springer New York, 2012:297-313.
  • 5Rosi H, Jammernegg W. The economic and environmentalperformance of dual sourcing: A newsvendor approach [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 143(1): 109- 119.
  • 6Du Shaofu, Zhu Lili, Liang Liang, et al. Emission-dependent supply chain and environment-policy-making in the 'cap-and- trade' system [J]. Energy Policy, 2013, 57: 61-67.
  • 7Nouira I, Frein Y, Hadj-Alouane A B. Optimization of aaanufacturing systems under environmental considerations for a greenness-dependent demand [J]. International Journal of Production -conomics, 2014, 150:188-198.
  • 8Toptal A, OzliJ H, Konur D. Joint decisions on inventoryreplenishment and emission reduction investment under different emission regulations [J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2014, 52(1), 243-269.
  • 9BIN S, DOSLATABADI H. Consumer Lifestyle Approach to US Energy Use and the Related CO2 Emissions[ J ]. Energy Policy, 2005,33 ( 2 ) : 197-208.
  • 10WISSEMA W, DELLINK R. AGE Analysis of the Impact of a Carbon Energy Tax on the Irish Economy[J]. Ecological Economics, 2007,61 ( 4 ) : 671-683.

引证文献15

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部