期刊文献+

公众科技风险感知与科技决策“困惑”之实证考量 被引量:6

The Empirical Investigation to the Dilemma Between Public Risk Perception of Science and Technology and Technology Decisions Making
原文传递
导出
摘要 目前科技决策的制定还使用基于定量的风险评估与标准化的方法,缺乏对公众风险感知的考虑,使隐含着复杂社会、心理、行为等因素的科技决策问题,被局限在纯科学议程的藩篱中,缺乏多元化视角。基于问卷调查的方法,通过了解公众对科技风险的认知、感知与评价,揭示其对科技决策的出台造成一定的"困惑":标准制定的模糊性;科技决策的不确定性;议程设置的困境;两难悖论的选择及其分配的尴尬。通过考虑公众的风险感知,建立"民主模型",正视理性不信任的功效,提升科技决策的民主化与科学化水平。 Current technology decision making is still basically limited risk assessment based on quantitative and standardized methods, lacking of the consideration of public risk perception, so that the technological decision problem impling complex social, psychological, behavioral factors, which is confined to purely scientific barriers and lack of diversification perspective. Based on survey methods, by understanding the public's awareness, perception and evaluation to technology risk, which reveal its bring the certain dilemma to science and technology decision-making: Normative ambiguity; technological uncertainty in decision-making; agenda-setting dilemma; selection Paradox and allocation embarrassment. By considering the risk to the public perception, establishing a 'democrat-ic mode', facing the efficacy of irrational distrust, that enhance the democratic and scientific level of science and technology decision-making.
作者 孙壮珍 宋伟
出处 《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第8期3-10,共8页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基金 西南科技大学政治学院基层政府治理课题(13sxt003)
关键词 公众 科技 风险感知 决策困惑 public science and technology risk perception decisions making dilemma the empirical investigation
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1杨雪冬.风险社会中的制度想象力[EB/OL][2007-09-17].http://theory.people.com.cn/GB/49154/49156/6274451.html.
  • 2Douglas M, Wildavsky A. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.
  • 3[德]乌尔里希·贝克著 何博闻译.风险社会[M].南京:译林出版社,2004..
  • 4安东尼.吉登斯.现代性的后果[M].田禾,译.南京:译林出版社,2011.
  • 5[美]IH.w刘易斯.技术与风险[M].杨健,缪建兴,译.北京:中国对外翻译出版公司,1997.
  • 6谢科范.创立科技风险学的构想[J].科学学与科学技术管理,1995,16(3):23-25. 被引量:3
  • 7许志晋,毛宝铭.论科技风险的产生与治理[J].科学学研究,2006,24(4):488-491. 被引量:18
  • 8徐凌.试论公众参与科技决策[J].科学技术与辩证法,2007,24(2):94-100. 被引量:12
  • 9刘岩.社会风险理论新探[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社.2008.
  • 10Slovic P. Perceived risk, trust, and democracy[J], Risk Analysis, 1993(13):675-682.

二级参考文献56

共引文献257

同被引文献67

引证文献6

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部