摘要
欧几里德在《几何学》中创立的公理化方法是建构严格理论的不二法门。对于人文社科领域内的理论来说,越是接近这种方法,其理论就越严格且更加接近于科学。权利理论也是如此。目前,"要素说"是国内学界比较流行的权利界定理论。但"要素说"实质上是对西方现有各种权利理论的综合。如何将包含内在冲突的诸多"要素"结合起来形成一个前后一贯的、有逻辑自洽性的理论将面临巨大的挑战。
The Axiomatic method established in Euclidean Geometry is the only way to construct a rigid theory. As for humanities and social science, the more a theory approaches this method, the more rigid it will be and more closer to natural sciences. And it is also true for fights theories. Nowadays, "Elements Theory" is quite popular in China. However, “Elements Theory” is only a synthesization of contemporary western fights theories. There are great challenges to synthesize so many "elements" into one coherent and logically consistent theory.
出处
《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第4期145-147,共3页
Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
关键词
权利
要素说
自洽性
rights
Elements Theory
logical consistency