交锁髓内钉、单侧外固定架治疗胫腓骨骨折的效果对比

Interlocking intramedullary nails, effect of tibiofibula fractures treated by unilateral external fixator

目的探讨交锁髓内钉与单侧外固定架治疗胫腓骨骨折的效果。方法选取我院胫腓骨骨折患者50例,依固定方式不同分为两组,分别采用交锁髓内钉(观察组)与单侧外固定架(对照组)治疗,比较两组疗效。结果两组在优良率、一期愈合率、愈合时间及并发症上差异显著(P<0.05)。结论交锁髓内钉内固定治疗胫腓骨骨折效果确切,并发症少,值得推广。

Objective To study the exchange of interlocking intramedullary nail and external fixator for the treatment of tibiofibula fractures. Methods A total of 50 patients with department of tibiofibula fracture, divided into two groups according to the different fixation metnods, separately used in interlocking intramedullary nail （observation group） and unilateral external fixator （control group） treatment, compared two groups of curative effect. Results The two groups in the fine rate, rate of primary healing, healing time and complications in significant difference （P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion Pay tibiofibula fractures treated by interlocking intramedullary nail fixation effect is exact, fewer complications, worthy of promotion.