2Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnosticand Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures(Committee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty)[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,1993,22(7):2033.
3Schepis T,Marwan M,Pflederer T,et al.Quantification of noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaques with dual source computed tomography:comparison to intravascular ultrasound[J].Heart,2010,96(8):610-615.
4Austen WG,Edwards JE,Frye BL,et al.A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease:report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Dis-ease,Council on Cardiovascular Surgery,American Heart Association[J].Circulation,1975,51(4 Suppl):5-40.
5Kilian JG,Celermajer DS,Adams MR.Safety of coronary angioplasty to chronic total occlusions[J].Int J Cardiol,2005,103(3):256-258.
6Rathore S,Hakeem A,Pauriah M,et al.A comparison of the transradial and the transfemoral approach in chronic total occlusion pereutaneous coronary intervention[J].Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2009,73(7):883-887.
8Sachdeva R,Sarkar K,Sukhija R,et al.Revascularization of chronic total occlusion of coronary artery:a challenge and an opportunity[J].Indian Heart J,2006,58(6):401-403.
9Cuneo A,Tebbe U.The management of chronic total coronary occlusions[J].Minerva Cardioangiol,2008,56(5):527-541.
10De Felice F,Fiorilli R,Parma A,et al.Clinical outcome of patients with chronic total occinsion treated with drug-eluting stents[J].Int J Cordial,2009,132(3):337-341.
4Lancellotti P,Nkomo VT,Badano,et al.Expert consensus for multimodality imaging evaluation of cardiovascular complications of radiotherapy in adults:a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography[J].Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging,2013,14:721-740.
5Gauss S,Achenbach S,Pflederer T,et al.Assessment of coronary artery remodelling by dual-source CT:a head-to-head comparison with intravascular ultrasound[J].Heart,2011,97:991-997.
6Nakashima Y,Okada M,Washida Y,et al.Evaluation of image quality on a per-patient,per-vessel,and per-segment basis by noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section computed tomography:dual-source versus single-source computed tomography[J].Jpn J Radiol,2011,29:316-323.
7Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D, Schepis T, Pflederer T, Anders K, Kuettner A, Daniel WG, Uder M, Lell MM. Cor- onary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J. 2010 Feb; 31 (3) : 340 -6.
8Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, Becker A, Nikolaou K, Paul S, Wintersperger B, Reiser M, Becker CR, Steinbeck G, Boekstegers P. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstr- uctive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravaseular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jul 5; 46 (1): 147-54.
9Johnson T, Nikolaou K, Busch S, et al. Diagnostic accura- cy of dual-source computed tomography in the diagnosis of cor- onary artery disease. Investigative Radiology, 2007o 42 (10) : 684 -691.
10Seheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of dual- source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate contrOl. Eur Radiol, 2006, 16(12) : 2739 -2747.
