期刊文献+

喉罩咽喉内不同旋转角度对气道密封压的影响 被引量:1

Influence of different rotation angles of laryngeal mask in throat on airway sealing pressure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 评价超声下喉罩咽喉内不同旋转度对气道密封压的影响.方法 择期全身麻醉下妇科手术患者128例,ASA分级Ⅰ~Ⅱ级.第一位麻醉医生麻醉诱导后插入一次性使用喉罩气道导管行机械正压通气并记录气道峰压(peak inspiratory pressure,PIP).超声医生使用颈部超声(USG)通过食道甲状腺横切面观察喉罩旋转度进行评估并记录,第二位麻醉医生使用纤维支气管镜(fiberoptic bronchoscope,FOB)确认喉罩位置,第三位麻醉医生记录口咽漏气压(OLP).结果 与轻度旋转比较,中度和重度旋转时高OLP患者例数减少(P<0.05);与中度旋转比较,重度旋转时高OLP患者例数减少(P<0.05).不同旋转位置的纤维支气管镜分级以及气道峰压值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 超声提示喉罩轻度旋转时患者的OLP明显提高,喉罩的密闭性较好,满足手术要求. Objective To evaluate the influence of different rotation angles of laryngeal mask in throat on the airway sealing pressure under ultrasound. Methods 128 patients with ASA grade I to II, who had received gynecological surgery under general anesthesia were selected. The first anesthetist conducted mechanical positive pressure ventilation by inserting disposable laryngeal mask airway catheter after anesthesia induction and record peak inspiratory pressure (PIP).The ultrasound doctor observed the laryngeal mask rotation degree through esophagus thyroid transaction under ul- trasonography(USG) and record;The second anesthetist confirmed the location of laryngeal mask using fiberoptie bron- ehoseope(FOB);The third anesthetist recorded oropharyngeal leak pressure(OLP). Results Compared to slight rotation, the case numbers of high OLP patients of moderate and severe rotation were smaller(P〈0.05); Compared to moderate ro- tation, the case number of high OLP patients of severe rotation was smaller(P〈0.05). The differences in fiber broncho- scope grade and peak inspiratory pressure between different rotation locations were not statistically significant (P〈0.05). Conclusion Ultrasound suggests that the patients' OLP of mild laryngeal mask rotation improves significantly.The leakproofnes of laryngeal mask is good and meets the surgical requirements.
出处 《中国现代医生》 2014年第22期53-55,共3页 China Modern Doctor
基金 浙江省医药卫生一般研究计划B类项目(2013KYB244)
关键词 超声检查 喉罩 口咽漏气压 Ultrasound examination Laryngeal mask Oropharyngeal leak pressure
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Alan S,Alen P,Tedi C.The addition of a brief ultrasound examination to elinicalassessment increases the ability to confirm placement of double-lumen endotracheal tubes[J].J Clin Anesth, 2010,22.246-249.
  • 2Chandan,Sharma,Raveendra. Fiberoptic assessment of laryngeal mask airway placement: a comparison of blind insertion and insertion with the use of a laryngoscope[J].J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 2009,8 (2) : 95-98.
  • 3Deepak G,Arvind S,Nader H. Ultrasound confirmation of laryngeal mask airway placement correlates with fiberop- ticlaryngoscope findings[J]. MEJ Anesth, 2011,21 (2) : 283- 290.
  • 4周振锋,严敏,郁丽娜,任秋生,严国章,王媛媛,吴猛.超声定位成年病人喉罩位置的效果:与纤维支气管镜比较[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2013,33(4):466-469. 被引量:12
  • 5Campbell RL,Biddle C,Assudmi N. Fiberoptic assessment of laryngeal mask airway placement: blind insertion ver- sus direct visual epiglottoscopy[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2004,62:1108-1113.
  • 6Chou HC ,Tseng WP,Wang CH. Tracheal rapid ultrasound exam (TRUE) for confirmingendotracheal tube placement during emergency intubation[J].Resuscitation,2011,82(10) : 1279-1284.
  • 7任全,李斌,吴琼,景亮.喉部听诊法与胸部听诊法鉴别喉罩喉封闭性[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2010,26(5):441-442. 被引量:5
  • 8李士通.喉罩临床应用相关问题[J].继续医学教育,2006,20(15):69-78. 被引量:37
  • 9Brimaeombe J, Keller C. Stability of the LMA-ProSeal and standard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions:a randomized crossover study[J]. Eur J Anaes- thesiol, 2003,20: 65-69.
  • 10Brimacombe J,Keller C,Fullekrug B,et al.A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal with classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized,nonparalyzed patients[J].Anesthe- siology, 2002,96 (2) : 289-295.

二级参考文献23

  • 1刘志强,钱海良,王国平,江军.紧急人工气道的新选择-喉罩通气[J].中华临床医药杂志(北京),2004,5(15):51-53. 被引量:5
  • 2李士通.喉罩临床应用相关问题[J].继续医学教育,2006,20(15):69-78. 被引量:37
  • 3Campbell RB,Biddle C.Assudmi N,et al.Fiberoptic assessment of laryngeal mask airway placement:blind insertion versus direct visual epiglottoscopy.J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2004,62:1108-1113.
  • 4Joshi S, Sciacca RR, Solanki DR, et al. A prospective evuation of clinical tests for placement of laryngeal mask airways. Anesthesiolo-gy,1998,89(5):1141-1146.
  • 5Campbell RL, Biddle C, Assudmi N. Fiberoptic assessment of laryn- geal mask airway placement: blind insertion versus direct visual epi- glottoscopy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2004,62 (9) : 1108-1113.
  • 6Chandan SN, Sharma SM, Raveendra US, et al. Fiberoptic assessment of laryngeal mask airway placement : a comparison of blind insertion and insertion with the use of a laryngoscope. J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 2009,8 (2) : 95-98.
  • 7Gupta D, Srirajakalidindi A, Habli N, et al. Ultrasound confirmation of laryngeal mask airway placement correlates with fiberopti- clmyngoscope findings. Middle East J Anesthesiol, 2011,21 (2) : 283-287.
  • 8Sustic A, Protic A, Cicvaric T,et al. The addition of a brief ultra- sound examination to clinical assessment increases the ability to con- firm placement of double-lumen endotracheal tubes. J Clin Anestb, 2010,22(4) :246-249.
  • 9Chou HC,Tseng WP,Wang CH, et al. Tracheal rapid uhrasound ex- am (T. R. U. E) for confirming endotracheal tube placement during emergency intubation. Resuscitation, 2011,82(10) : 1279-1284.
  • 10Keller C, Bfimacombe JR, Keller K, et al. Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth,1999,82(2):286-287.

共引文献51

同被引文献13

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部