期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

生物型膝关节假体的研究进展 被引量：6

下载PDF
导出
摘要 生物型膝关节假体即非骨水泥型膝关节假体，其通过假体-骨界面紧密接触，促使骨组织长入假体，提高假体与髓腔的结合强度，从而达到假体的长期稳定。使用生物型人工膝关节，可保存患者骨量，同时避免或降低了骨水泥所导致的毒副作用。目前，随着工程技术与生物材料的发展，临床与科研对于生物型膝关节假体的研究也愈发受到关注。本文就生物型膝关节假体的研究进展予以综述。
作者 王智勇 张志强
机构地区 山西医科大学 山西医科大学第二医院骨科
出处 《实用骨科杂志》 2014年第7期625-628,共4页 Journal of Practical Orthopaedics
关键词 膝关节假体 生物型 非骨水泥型 人工膝关节 结合强度 毒副作用 生物材料 工程技术
分类号 R318.17 [医药卫生—生物医学工程]
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1王坤正.初次全髋关节置换术选择骨水泥或生物型固定方式的比较[J].中华关节外科杂志（电子版）,2012,6(4):1-3. 被引量：19
  • 2张涛,李海峰,阮狄克.生物型膝关节表面假体的临床应用进展[J].中国骨与关节杂志,2012,1(5):513-517. 被引量：4
  • 3Cossetto DJ, Gouda AD. Uncemented tibial fixation total knee arthroplasty [ J ]. J Arthroplasty, 2011,26 ( 1 ) : 41- 44.
  • 4Drexler M, Dwyer T, Marmor M, et al. Cementless fixa- tion in total knee arthroplasty: down the boulevard of broken dreams-opposes [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg ( Br), 2012,94(11 Suppl A) :85-89.
  • 5翟羽,瞿玉兴.生物型膝关节假体的临床应用进展[J].海南医学院学报,2010,16(10):1379-1381. 被引量：3
  • 6Kim HW, Kim HE, Salih V, et aL Sol-gel-modified tita- nium with hydroxyapatite thin films and effect on osteo- blast-like cell responses [ J ]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2005,74( 3 ) :294-305.
  • 7Meneghini RM, Daluga A, Soliman M. Mechanical sta- bility of cementless tibial components in normal and os- teoporotic bone [ J]. J Knee Surg, 2011,24 ( 3 ) : 191- 196.
  • 8Haenle M, Lindner T, Ellenrieder M, et al. Bony inte- gration of titanium implants with a novel bioactive calci- um titanate (Ca4Ti3OlO) surface treatment in a rabbit model[ J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2012, 100 (10): 2710-2716.
  • 9Hayakawa K, Date H, Tsujimura S, et al. Mid-term re- suits of total knee arthroplasty with a porous tantalum monoblock tibial component [ J ]. Knee, 2014,21 ( 1 ) : 199-203.
  • 10Meneghini RM, Hanssen AD. Cementless fixation in to- tal knee arthroplasty : past, present, and future [ J ]. J Knee Sin-g,2008,21 (4) :307-314.

二级参考文献56

  • 1马杰科,裴福兴,李幼平,熊鹰,魏欣.人工髋关节置换术股骨柄固定方式的安全性系统评价[J].中国循证医学杂志,2005,5(4):296-302. 被引量：7
  • 2Cook SD, Barrack RL, Thomas KA, et al. Quantitative analysis of tissue growth into human porous total hip corn ponents[J]. J Arthroplasty, 1988,3(3) :249-262.
  • 3Hirao M, Sugamoto K, Tamai N, et al. Macro-struetural, effect of metal surfaces treated using computer assisted yttrium aluminum-garnet laser scanning on bone implant fi xation[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2005,73(2) : 213-222.
  • 4Meneghini RM, Hanssen AD. Cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty: past, present, and future[J]. J Krree Surg, 2008,21 (4): 307-314.
  • 5Blom AW, Cunningham JL, Hughes G, et al. The compatibility of ceramic bone graft substitutes as allograft extenders for use in impaction grafting of the femur[J]. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) ,2005,87:421-425.
  • 6Zhang Y , Ahn PB, Fitzpatrick DC, et al. Interracial frictional behavior: cancellous, cortical bone,and a novel porous tantalum biomaterial[J]. J Muse Res, 1999,3 (1) :245-247.
  • 7Florio CS, Poggie RA, Sidebotham C, et al. Stability characteristics of a cementless monoblock porous tantalum tibial implant without ancillary fixation[J]. Trans Orthop Res Soc,2004,19(5) :562-572.
  • 8Simmons CA. Mechanical regulation of localized and appositional bone formation aroundbone-interfacing implants[J]. J Biomed Mater Res,2001,55 : 63-71.
  • 9Simmons CA. Differences in osseointegration rate due to implant surface geometry can be explained by local tissue strains[J]. J Orthop Res,2001,19:187-194.
  • 10Cooke C, Walter WK. Tibial fixation without screws in cementless total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2006,21 (2) :237-241.

共引文献22

同被引文献48

  • 1KOLISEK FR, MONT MA, SEYLER TM, et al. Total knee arthro- plasty using cemengtless keels and cenmented tibial trays: 10-year rusults [J]. Int Orthop, 2009, 33 (1) : 117- 121. DOI: 10.1007/ s00264-007-0502-y.
  • 2UNGER AS, DUGGAN JP. Midterm rusuhs of a porous tantalum monoblock tibia component clinical and radiographic result of 108 knees [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2011,26(6) : 855-860. DOI: 10.1016/j. arth.2010.08.017.
  • 3MINODA Y, KOBAYASHI A, IKEBUCHI M, et al. Porous tantalum tibial component prevents periprosthetic loss of bone mineral densi- ty after total knee arthroplasty for five years-a matched cohort study [J]. J Athroplasty, 2013,28 (10) : 1760-1764. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth. 2013.03.031.
  • 4Cossetto DJ, Gouda AD. Uneemented tibial fixation total knee arthro- plasty [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2011,26 (1) : 41-44. DOI: 10.1016/j. arth.2009.12.008.
  • 5KAMATH AF, LEE GC, SI-IETH NP, et al. Prospective results of un- cemented tantalum monoblock tibia in total knee arthroplasty : mini- mum 5-year follow-up in patients younger than 55 years [J]. J Ath- roplasty, 2011,26 (8) : 1390-1395. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06. 030.
  • 6SCHILDHAUER TA, ROBIE B, MUHR G, et al. Bacterial ahher- ence to tantalum versus commonly used orthopedic metallic implant materials [ J ]. J Orthop Trauma, 2006,20 (7) :476-484.
  • 7O' KEEFE TJ, WINTER S, LEWALLEN DG, et al. Clinical and ra- diographic evaluation of a monoblock tibial component [J]. J Athro- plasty, 2010,25 ( 5 ) : 785-792.
  • 8GUPTA KS, CHU A, RANAWAT AS, et al. Review article : osteoiy- sis after total knee arthroplasty [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2007,22: 787. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.05.029.
  • 9NAUDIOE DDR, AMMEEN DJ, ENGH GA, et al. Wear and osteol- ysis around total knee arthroplasty [J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2007, 15 ( 1 ) : 53-64.
  • 10王伟,郝花,齐进如,王剑峰,左进步,余磊.全膝关节置换术治疗膝关节骨性关节炎[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2010,19(10):1227-1228. 被引量：22

引证文献6

二级引证文献25

实用骨科杂志
2014年 第7期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部