阻却违法性事由错误的重新定性——以“假想防卫”为例

Nature Determination of Wrong Deterrent Illegality Cause

阻却违法性事由错误的问题在我国刑法通说上一直被简单地按照事实认识错误的原则来处理,但其中依然存在一些值得我们重新思考的问题,比如关于阻却违法性事由的错误到底是否属于事实错误,以及直接按照事实错误的原则来处理是否真正合理。事实上这无法解决关于阻却违法性事由错误行为的恶意的共犯问题。以假想防卫为例借鉴限制法律效果的责任理论,可以重新认识和解决阻却违法性事由的错误问题。

The deterrent illegality cause has been simply treated and handled as fact cognitional error in our country criminal law, but for the concept which seems to be no big controversy is still worth rethinking as a problem, forexample, whether it belong to the factual errors, as well as direct, according to the principle of factual errors tohandle whether really reasonable. In fact, it can＇ t stop violations for malicious accomplice. With imaginary defenseas an example, we can learn from ＂responsibility theory of limit of the legal effect＂, so as to realize and solve theproblem of deterrent illegality cause.