论有限责任公司发起人瑕疵出资的补缴责任——以《〈公司法〉司法解释(三)》为视角

Contribution Payment Responsibility of Flaws Capital of Limited Liability Company Originator——Taking the Judicial Interpretation of the Company Law(3) for Perspective

我国2013年《公司法》修正案关于公司设立时出资问题的规定彰显了现代企业制度的自治理念,《公司法司法解释(三)》进一步细化了有限责任公司发起人出资瑕疵的补缴责任来确保公司资本的充足和真实。但是学界对《公司法司法解释(三)》的相关规定是否合理存在争议,本文拟从有限责任公司瑕疵出资发起人补缴责任的法律属性、《公司法司法解释(三)》第13条规定的有限责任公司足额发起人连带补缴责任的合理性以及债权人成为出资补缴请求权主体的理论依据三个角度出发,探讨我国有限责任公司发起人瑕疵出资的补缴责任体系。

Chinese company law amendment in 2013 demonstrates the concept of autonomy of modem enterprise sys-tem in the provisions of the company investment at establishment, the judicial interpretation （3） of the company lawfurther refinement the limited liability company sponsors of capital contribution flaw payment of the responsibility toensure that the company capital is sufficient and true. But the academic circles are controversial to the company lawjudicial interpretation （3） for whether the relevant provisions is rational, this article discusses our country limitedliability company promoter flaws capital contribution system of payment of duty from a limited liability company fromthree perspective, they are ： the legal nature of the flaws capital originator for contribution payment duty, the ration-ality of the payment duty of the joint sponsors in provisions of article 13 of the company law judicial interpretation （3） for co. , LTD, and the theory basis of creditors to be payment subject.