期刊文献+

Pitchfork分析法评估Twin—block矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ^1错[牙合]的硬组织疗效 被引量:6

Pitchfork analysis in evaluating the hard tissue change of Class II division 1 malocclusion treated by Twin-block appliance
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的应用Pitchfork分析法研究排除自然生长因素后,Twin-block矫治器治疗替牙期或恒牙早期安氏Ⅱ1错引起的硬组织改变。方法选择15例安氏Ⅱ1下颌后缩患者,观察10个月作为自然生长对照组,随后采用Twin-block矫正器治疗,平均治疗约10个月。对治疗及观察前后头颅侧位片进行Pitchfork测量分析,评价对照期和治疗期在平均功能性平面上骨骼及牙齿的位置变化的矫治疗效。结果在5.97 mm(P<0.01)的覆盖减少量和4.86 mm(P<0.01)的磨牙关系改善中,骨骼效应占41.2%和50.7%,牙齿效应分别占58.8%和49.3%,其中4.86 mm磨牙关系改善中,包括骨性改变2.46 mm、牙性改变2.40 mm,骨性改变中下颌骨贡献率约为81.7%。结论 Twin-block矫治器使发育期安氏Ⅱ1错牙患者覆盖、磨牙关系均得到较好改善,有效促进了下颌骨矢状方向上的生长发育,有利于Ⅱ类骨面型的纠正。 Objective To evaluate the skeletal and dental contribution rate to the treatment effects of Twin-block appliance excluding the influence of natural growth on patients with Class II divisionl malocclusion during mixed or early permanent dentition. Methods 15 Class II divisionl malocclusion patients in mixed or early permanent dentition were observed for 10 months and then treated by Twin-block appliance for an average of 10 months another. The cephalometric data of two groups before and after control or treatment were collected. Then Pitchfork analysis was performed to evaluate the skeletal and dental changes between these two periods. Results The treatment made 5.97 mm (P〈0.01) and 4.85 mm (P〈0.01) overjet and molar correction respectively, of which 41.2% and 50.7% due to skeletal effect, 58.8% and 49.3% was due to dental effect. Molar relationship was corrected by 4.85 mm in general, which included 2.46 mm skeletal change and 2.40 mm dental change. And within the skeletal change, the contribution ratio of lower jaw was about 81.7%. Conclusions Deep overjet and molar relation can be improved greatly by the Twin-block appliance. It can promote the mandibular growth sagitally. All these aspects contribute to correction the Class II skeletal relationship.
出处 《中华临床医师杂志(电子版)》 CAS 2014年第14期64-67,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition)
基金 广州市医药卫生科技一般引导项目(20121A011057)
关键词 错[牙合]安氏Ⅱ类 TWIN-BLOCK矫治器 Pitchfork分析法 Malocclusion, angle class II Twin-block appliance Pitchfork analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Macnamara J'A. Components of class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age[J]. Angle Orthod, 1981, 51(3): 177-202.
  • 2Toth LR, McNamara JA. Treatment effects produced by the Twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Ffankel compared with an untreated Class H sample[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1999, 116(6): 597-609.
  • 3王茜,左艳萍,董福生.Pancherz分析法评估Twin-block矫治器治疗青少年安氏Ⅱ~1错的硬组织效应[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2013,6(3):153-157. 被引量:6
  • 4Illing HM, Morris DO, Lee RT. A prospective evaluation of Bass, bionator and Twin-block appliances. Part I: the hard tissues[J]. Eur J Orthod, 1998, 20(5): 501-516.
  • 5陈卓,赵曼,刘惠莉.Twinblock矫治安氏Ⅱ~1类错畸形硬组织改变的研究[J].中国美容医学,2007,16(5):685-687. 被引量:6
  • 6Johnston LE Jr. A comparative analysis of Class II treatments: a retrospective/prospective alternative[J]. Clin Orthod Res, 1998, 1(2): 142-146.
  • 7Ashok K J, Ritu D, Hari P. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twinblock and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: A comparative study[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006, 130(5): 594-602.
  • 8徐芸.口腔正畸学-现代原理与技术[M].天津:天津科技翻译出版公司,1996:447-450;384-434
  • 9Clark WJ. The Twin-block technique. A functional orthopedic appliance system[J]. Am J Orthod Dantofacial Orthop, 1988, 93(1): 1-18.
  • 10Lund DI, Sandler PJ. The effects of Twin Blocks: a prospective controlled study[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1998, 113(1): 104-110.

二级参考文献20

  • 1左艳萍,徐宝华,刘学聪.双垫矫治器矫治安格尔Ⅱ类错的体会[J].口腔正畸学,2000,7(1):31-32. 被引量:31
  • 2姜晓蕾,杜传亮,姜蕾,李立英,邵利云.Twin block矫治安氏骨性Ⅱ类错软硬组织改变的研究[J].山东医药,2005,45(33):51-52. 被引量:3
  • 3刘艳,刘月华.Twin-block矫治器治疗早期骨性II类错牙合的X线头影测量分析[J].上海口腔医学,2005,14(6):569-572. 被引量:6
  • 4徐芸.口腔正畸学--现代原理与技术[M].天津:天津科技翻译出版公司,1996.473-505.
  • 5Macnamara JA.Components of class Ⅱ malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age[J].Angel Othorl,1981,51 (3):177-202.
  • 6Singh GD,Clark WJ.Localization of mandibular changes in patients with class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusions treated with twin-block appliances:finiteelement scaling analysis[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2001,119(4):419-425.
  • 7Cura N, Sarac M, Ozttirk Y, et al. Orthodontic and orthopedic effects of Activator, Activator-HG combination, and Bass appli- ances: a comparative study [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Or- thop, 1996, 110( 1 ) : 36-45.
  • 8Parkin NA, McKeown HF, Sandier PJ. Comparison of 2 modifi- cations of the twin-block appliance in matched Class II sam- ples [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2001, 119 (6) : 572-577.
  • 9Illing HM, Morris DO, Lee RT. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin block appliances. Part I -The hard tis- sues [J].Eur J Orthod 1998, 20(5):501-516.
  • 10Ozturk Y, Tankuter N.Class II: a comparson of activator and ac- tivator headgear combination appliances [J]. Eur J Orthod, 1994, 16(2) : 149-157.

共引文献25

同被引文献60

引证文献6

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部