期刊文献+

英语本科与翻译硕士专业学位(MTI)的课程衔接研究 被引量:1

Cohesion Study of Curriculum Designs for English Undergraduate and MTI
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当前在跨学历阶段的课程设置上存在着课程重复开设、课程体系衔接不紧密等问题和不足,其原因主要有:MTI院校不重视其课程与英语本科课程的衔接;培养复合型人才需要增加专业知识课程的比例,本科与MTI两个层次的英语专业知识课程重复的几率也相应地增加。针对这些问题,应该采取一定的应对措施协调英语本科和MTI课程设置:本科开设的课程,MTI可以允许学生考核及格后申请免修;规定专业方向限选课;将专业知识课程变成"专业知识+专业技能"课程;进行课程设置的前期调查等。 The present curriculum design across educational backgrounds is faced with problems like course repetition,lack of cohesion in the curriculum system. The reasons for such problems mainly include:MTI institutes have not paid enough attention to the cohesion of undergraduate and postgraduate courses; the training objective aims at inter-disciplinary talents,which requires an increase in the proportion of specialized courses. Accordingly,the repetition rate of specialized English courses at two levels ( undergraduate and MTI) increases. In terms of these problems, some countermeasures are needed to coordinate the cross-level curriculum designs: students who have passed the examination of a repeated course should be allowed to apply for exemptions;compulsory electives ought to be set;specialized courses can include both professional skills and knowledge;pre-study is necessary before the curriculum design,and so on.
出处 《广东第二师范学院学报》 2014年第4期99-104,共6页 Journal of Guangdong University of Education
基金 广东省教育科研"十二五"规划2012年度项目(2012JK041) 广东外语外贸大学2010科研项目
关键词 英语本科 翻译硕士专业学位 课程设置 English-major undergraduates curriculum design
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献27

  • 1韦理.基础课程改革与高等师范院校英语专业课程设置[J].陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002,31(S3):7-9. 被引量:8
  • 2黄源深.思辨缺席[J].外语与外语教学,1998(7). 被引量:919
  • 3戴炜栋.构建具有中国特色的英语教学“一条龙”体系[J].外语教学与研究,2001,33(5):322-327. 被引量:954
  • 4何其莘.翻译和外语教学[J].中国翻译,2007,28(4):11-12. 被引量:68
  • 5杨英姿.翻译硕士专业学位教育与翻译职业资格证书接轨[EB/OL].中国翻译协会网站http://www.tac-online.org.cn/ch/tran/2010-08/12/content-3657318.htm,2010-8-12/2011-10-30.
  • 6关于《翻译硕士专业学位设置方案》的说明[EB/OL].中国翻译协会网站.htrp://www.tac-online.org.cn/ch/tran/2009-09-24/content_3156107.htm.2009-9-24/2011-10-30.
  • 7黄忠廉.翻译硕士专业学位更应突出应用性和实践性[EB/OL].中国社会科学报.http://www.cass.net.cn/file/20100615273234.htm,2010-6-15/2011-10-30.
  • 8Eisner, E. W. Who Decides What School Teach [J]. Phi Delta Kappan, 1990, 71 (3) :523 -526.
  • 9Petrie, a, S. Muhidisciplinary Technology Education [J]. International Journal of Technology and Design Education,1998, 8 (2) : 105 - 138.
  • 10Aronowitz, S. The Punishment of Disciplines [A]. In Aronowitz. S. & H. A. Giroux ( eds. ). Postmodern Education[C]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1991.136 - 156.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部