区域性贸易合作下反倾销法与竞争法之博弈

The Game of Anti-dumping and Competition Law under Regional Trade Co-operation

从理论上看,根据实体法调整的范畴,竞争法和反倾销法的内在性质和功能具有关联性,竞争法是可以代替反倾销法的。从贸易实践看,现今的反倾销机制迫切需要改革,甚至可能被其他更为有效的法律机制替代,而反倾销法和竞争法本质上的联系为竞争法制约掠夺性倾销行为提供了正当理由。基于此,有两种可能的模式会出现:一是当竞争法被用来弥补反倾销法存在的制度缺陷时,两种机制必然同时存在;二是在竞争法被用来完全代替反倾销制度的情况下,统一适用的竞争法体系将被建立,而成员国内部反倾销实践将不复存在。但问题的关键在于,各国在缔结区域性贸易协定时,是建立两种法并行的法律机制,还是选择单一的竞争法体系,还必然会受到经济一体化、竞争法法律传统、竞争法体系融合等众多因素的影响。

Theoretically speaking,according to the adjustment scope of substantial law,there are some relations between Competition Law and Anti-dumping Law in terms of nature and function;and Anti-dumping Law can be replaced by Competition Law. According to the practice of trade,it is urgent for us to carry out reform on Anti-dumping mechanism;and this law could even be replaced by other more effective legal mechanism;and the relation between Anti-dumping and Competition Law provides a good reason for Competition Law to restrict aggressive dumping. Based on this,there are two possible modes. But the key is that,while formulating the regional trade agreement,if these countries will choose the legal mechanism with two or only one law will be influenced by many factors,such as economic integration,the legal tradition of competition law and the integration of competition law system.