摘要
国内外关于马克思哲学思想发展的五大解读模式的关键区别,是源于对《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中所体现出的建立在异化劳动概念基础上的异化史观在唯物史观形成过程中的地位上的理解。《1844年经济学哲学手稿》是马克思的思想从不成熟到成熟之间的一部著作,在其中,人本主义异化逻辑与从客观经济现实出发的科学逻辑交织在一起,前者占主导地位,但后者开辟了通向唯物史观的道路。
International and domestic theorists's tudies on the development of Marx's philosophy have formed five interpreting modes.Among the five modes, the key difference stems from different understanding to status of the alienated conception of history that isembodied in Manuscript of Economics and Philosophy in 1844(shortened as Manuscript) and established on the concept of alienatedlabor in the formation of historical materialism. Manuscript is the work that is in the process of Marx's thoughts from immaturity tomaturity. In this work, the humanistic alienation logic intertwines with the science logic from objective economic reality; the formerplays a dominant role and the latter opens the way to historical materialism.
出处
《中国石油大学学报(社会科学版)》
2014年第4期64-69,共6页
Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Social Sciences)
基金
中国石油大学(北京)2013年度"研究生教育质量与创新工程"项目
关键词
《1844年经济学哲学手稿》
马克思哲学
解读模式
唯物史观
Manuscript of Economics and Philosophy in 1844
Marx's philosophy
interpreting mode
historical materialism