期刊文献+

对我国系统重要性金融机构划分标准的探讨

下载PDF
导出
摘要 此次金融危机爆发后,各界在加强和改善金融监管方面达成共识,其中一个重要方面是加强对各类金融机构、特别是系统重要性金融机构的监管,而这需要首先对金融机构进行划分。科学、合理地对金融机构进行划分,有助于明确监管范围,增强监管的针对性,从而降低金融风险发生的可能性,促进金融系统和经济的稳定。本文基于我国银行业2009—2011年相关数据对我国系统重要性金融机构的划分做了初步探讨。
作者 谈俊 羊芳芳
出处 《中共杭州市委党校学报》 2014年第4期48-54,共7页 Journal of the Party School of CPC Hangzhou
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献12

  • 1Acharya, V., Yorulmazer, T. Too Many to Fail: An Analysis of Time-inconsistency in Bank Closure Policies [R]. Bank of England Working Paper, 2007 (319).
  • 2Acharya, V. A Theory of Systemic Risk and Design of Prudential Bank Regulation [J]. Journal of Financial Stability, 2009 (5) : 224-255.
  • 3Acharya, V., Pedersen, L, Philippon, T. and Richardson, M. Regulating Systemic Risk. Chapter 15 in Acharya, Viral. V. and Matthew Richardson, Restoring Financial Stability: How to Repair a Failed System [M]. John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
  • 4Acharya, V., Santos, J., Yorulmazer, T. Systemic Risk and Deposit Insurance Premiums [J]. Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 2010 (8) .
  • 5Adrian, T., Brunnermeier, M. CoVaR [R]. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, 2010 (348).
  • 6Bernanke, B. Financial Reform to Address Systemic Risk [R]. Speech at the Council on Foreign Relations, Washington, DC, 2009 (10) .
  • 7BCBS Global Systemically Important Banks: Assessment Methodology and the Additional Loss Absorbency Requirement [R]. 2011.
  • 8Brownlees, C., Engle, R. Volatility, Correlation and Tails for Systemic Risk Measurement [R]. Working Paper, New York University, 2011.
  • 9Chan, Lau, J. Balance Sheet Network Analysis of Too-connected-to-fail Risk in Global and Domestic Banking Systems [R]. IMF Working Paper No. 10/107, 2010.
  • 10Deutsche Bank Research. Identifying Systemically Important Financial Institutions [R]. 2011.

共引文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部