期刊文献+

两点法腰硬联合麻醉在上腹部手术中的应用研究 被引量:2

Applied research of two-point combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in upper abdominal surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨两点法腰硬联合麻醉(two-point CSEA)用于上腹部手术的可行性。方法上腹部手术126例按住院单双号分为two-point CSEA组(n=69)和硬膜外组(EA组,n=57)。EA组于T8-9间隙行硬膜外腔穿刺置管,经导管给2%利多卡因,使阻滞平面达T4。two-point CSEA组于T7-8间隙行硬膜外腔穿刺置管,经管给2%利多卡因,于L2-3间隙行腰麻,注入复合布比卡因溶液3 ml。使阻滞平面达T4,以计分法评价肌松、牵拉反应以及麻醉效果。结果两组手术时间无统计学差异(P>0.05),two-point CSEA组阻滞范围显著大于EA组(P<0.01),镇痛效果、肌松程度以及牵拉反应抑制也显著好于EA组(P<0.01),而局麻药用量显著性少于EA组(P<0.01)。结论 two-point CSEA可有效安全地用于上腹部手术。 Objective To investigate the efficacy of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia(CSEA) in upper abdominal surgery.Mathods A total of 126 patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery were divided into two-point CSEA group(n =69)and epidural group (EA group,n =57).The epidural anesthesia was punctured at T8-9 space and resulted in the block level of T4 with 2% lidocaine in EA group.The epidural anesthesia was performed at T7-8 space with 2% lidocaine and spinal anesthesia was done at L2-3 space with bupivacaine solution 3 ml,and reached the block level of T4 in two-point CSEA group.The muscle relaxation,stretch reaction and the anesthetic effects were evaluated with scoring method.Results The block range was significantly greater in two-point CSEA group than in EA group(P <0.01),the anesthetic effect was better(P <0.01),and the dosage of local anesthesia was significantly lower(P <0.01).The operation time was not significantly different between two groups (P > 0.05).Conclusion Two-point CSEA is effective and safe for the upper abdominal surgery.
出处 《山西医科大学学报》 CAS 2014年第7期651-653,共3页 Journal of Shanxi Medical University
基金 南京军区医学科技创新基金资助项目(MS038)
关键词 硬膜外麻醉 腰硬联合麻醉 两点法腰硬联合麻醉 腹部手术 epidural anesthesia combined spinal-epidural anesthesia(CSEA) two-point CSEA abdominal surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献28

  • 1周文,江学成,胡宁利.腰麻阻滞平面与阑尾切除术中牵拉反应关系的探讨[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2005,25(7):512-513. 被引量:10
  • 2徐迎阳,岳云.咪唑安定镇静期顺行性遗忘的中枢神经电生理研究[J].解放军医学杂志,2006,31(10):982-982. 被引量:1
  • 3Rigg JR, Goldsmith CH. Recovery of ventilatory response to carbon dioxide after thiopentone, morphine and fentanyl in man. Can Anaesth Soc J, 1976, 23:370-382.
  • 4Nemethy M, Paroli L, Williams-Russo PG, et al. Assessing sedation with regional anesthesia: inter-rater agreement on a modified Wilson sedation scale. Anesth Analg, 2002, 94:723-728.
  • 5Scamman FL, Klein SL, Choi WW. Conscious sedation for procedures under local or topical anesthesia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 1983,94:21- 24.
  • 6Richards A, Griffiths M, Scully C. Wide variation in patient response to midazolam sedation for outpatient oral surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1993, 76:408-411.
  • 7Veselis RA, Reinsel RA, Feshchenko VA, et al. The comparative amnestic effects of midazolam, propofol, thiopental, and fentanyl at equisedative concentrations. Anesthesiology, 1997,87:749-764.
  • 8李树人.腹部、妇科和泌尿科手术麻醉[M]∥庄心良,曾因明,陈泊銮.现代麻醉学.3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:1283-1287.
  • 9徐鹏,王亚军.小剂量氯胺酮咪唑安定防治硬膜外麻醉下内脏牵拉反应的观察[J].河北医学,2007,13(8):942-944. 被引量:1
  • 10佟晓杰.内脏神经系统[M]//柏树令,应大君,丁文龙,等.系统解剖学.2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:415-436.

共引文献40

同被引文献7

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部