林业科技核心期刊在多个评价数据库的指标分析

Analysis of Index of Forestry Core Journals of Science and Technology in Different Evaluation Database

对林业科技核心期刊在多个评价系统中的现况进行了对比分析,结果表明因评价机构本身的差异(收录源期刊的总数不同,计量指标的统计来源不同,学科分类不同及计量指标的权重不同等)导致一些林业类期刊间不容易进行对比。通过解读林业科技核心期刊在多个评价数据库的指标,提示期刊应该长期不懈地坚持自己的办刊理念,从吸收学科高水平的论文做起,尽量发表与期刊所属学科相关的论文,走学科发展之路。作为期刊编辑在保证期刊刊登的文章能给同行业的研究者参考和使用外,同时要跟踪期刊评价数据库以及其它检索工具,关注各指标权重变化,了解各统计指标调整的趋势,积极跟进期刊在数据库的情况和在核心期刊中的排名,查找期刊存在的差距,通过努力提高期刊的综合影响力。

Core journals of forestry science and technology in multiple evaluation system of present situation has carried on the contrast analysis, the results show the difference of evaluation institutions（included the total number of source journals, measurement indicators statistical sources, classification and measurement index weights of different disciplines, etc） lead to the comparison among forestry journals not easy.However, the total direction of current evaluation institutions assess the core journals are consistent with each other, core journal rankings with in a few significant impact factors and cited frequency of the data in the database sorting is basically consistent.Through interpretation of forestry science and technology core journals in multiple evaluation index of the database, prompt journals should adhere to its publication idea, start with absorb high levels of this discipline papers, try to discipline related papers published in this journal belongs to, go the way of subject development.As journal editors in articles published in the journal can give reference for researchers in this industry, at the same time to track the periodical evaluation database searches and other tools, pay close attention to each index weight change, understand various statistical index adjustment trend, actively follow up the periodicals＇ development in database and ranking in core journals, find the gap between journals through efforts to improve the comprehensive influence of journals.