期刊文献+

Participatory forest management in Burkina Faso: Members' perception of performance

Participatory forest management in Burkina Faso: Members' perception of performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 This study examines variations in the performance of partic-ipatory forest management programs among four forest management groups (FMGs) in southern Burkina Faso, and assesses the factors that influence their members’ perceptions of performance through a house-hold survey of 216 members. Variations in performance scores among the FMGs were analyzed through multivariate analysis of variance while multinomial regression analysis was used to identify factors that influ-ence their perception of the performance. The results reveal significant differences in performance scores among FMGs. Members of some FMGs perceived that the participatory forest management program ena-bled them to get benefits from the sale of fuelwood while performance scores in the forest conservation and decision-making processes is gener-ally poor. The score for economic performance of FMGs in turn was related to better access to roads and markets. Group size tended to en-hance economic performance via its strong influence on annual fuelwood harvest, while the resource base appeared to be inconsequential. Mem-bers of the forest management groups perceived that large group size and group heterogeneity, particularly in terms of ethnicity, as well as knowledge and awareness of problems related to the forest environment have no influence on the performance of their respective groups. For rural communities to have a favorable disposition toward sustainable forest management, differences in member understanding of collective actions and their impact before and during the implementation of partic-ipatory forest management programs should be considered. This study examines variations in the performance of partic-ipatory forest management programs among four forest management groups (FMGs) in southern Burkina Faso, and assesses the factors that influence their members’ perceptions of performance through a house-hold survey of 216 members. Variations in performance scores among the FMGs were analyzed through multivariate analysis of variance while multinomial regression analysis was used to identify factors that influ-ence their perception of the performance. The results reveal significant differences in performance scores among FMGs. Members of some FMGs perceived that the participatory forest management program ena-bled them to get benefits from the sale of fuelwood while performance scores in the forest conservation and decision-making processes is gener-ally poor. The score for economic performance of FMGs in turn was related to better access to roads and markets. Group size tended to en-hance economic performance via its strong influence on annual fuelwood harvest, while the resource base appeared to be inconsequential. Mem-bers of the forest management groups perceived that large group size and group heterogeneity, particularly in terms of ethnicity, as well as knowledge and awareness of problems related to the forest environment have no influence on the performance of their respective groups. For rural communities to have a favorable disposition toward sustainable forest management, differences in member understanding of collective actions and their impact before and during the implementation of partic-ipatory forest management programs should be considered.
出处 《Journal of Forestry Research》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2014年第3期637-646,共10页 林业研究(英文版)
基金 Funding for this study was provided by Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency(Sida)
关键词 Common-pool resources Collective action Sustainableforest management West Africa Common-pool resources, Collective action, Sustainableforest management, West Africa
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1Adams WM, Hulme D. 2001. If community conservation is the answer in Africa, what is the question? Oryx, 35: 193-200.
  • 2Agrawal A, Gibson CC. 1999. Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27: 629-649.
  • 3Alesina A, La Ferrara E. 2000. Participation in heterogeneous communities. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115: 847-904.
  • 4Balland JM, Platteau JP. 1998. Division of the commons: a partial assessment of the new institutional economics of land rights. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80: 644-650.
  • 5Bardhan P. 1993. Analyties of the institution of informal cooperation in rural development. World Development, 21: 633-639.
  • 6Bellefontaine R, Gaston A, Petrucci Y. 2000. Management of natural forests of dry tropicalzones. Rome: FAO, 318 pp.
  • 7Chhetri RB, Pandey TR. 1992. User group forestry in the far western region of Nepal: Case studies from Baitadi and Achham. Katmandu: ICIMOD, 101 pp.
  • 8Cohen J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Publishers, 567 pp.
  • 9Coulibaly-Lingani P, Savadogn P, Tigabu M, Odtn PC. 2010. Factors influencing peoples' participation in forest management program in Burkina Faso. Forest Policy and Economics, 13: 292-302.
  • 10Coulibaly-Lingani P, Tigabu M, Savadogo P, Oden P-C, Ouadba J-M. 2009. Determinants of access to forest products in southern Burkina Faso. Forest Policy and Economics, 11:516-524.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部