地方政府食品安全监管考评指标赋分方法初探

Scoring method for government food safety supervision evaluation

目的研究探讨地方政府食品安全监管考评指标科学客观的赋分方法。方法应用层次分析法,设计考核评价指标间重要性比较表格,由各级地方政府不同部门的食品安全监管人员和技术专家独立判断指标间重要程度,汇总分析并计算考核评价指标的权重比例和各考核指标的赋分。结果 1完善体制机制、打击违法犯罪、督促企业落实主体责任、食品安全重点工作开展情况、食品安全事故处理、食品安全信息公布、食品安全宣传教育和有奖举办制度8个一级指标权重分别为21.3%、16.4%、14.7%、13.5%、13.2%、7.3%、7.1%、6.5%;2对每个二级指标也计算了权重比例,一级和二级指标共同确定了二级指标赋分;3层次分析法赋分与原方案赋分相比,总体基本一致,个别不同;4从食品安全监管的角度分析,体制机制、打击违法犯罪、落实企业主体责任是当前地方政府食品安全监管工作的重中之重。结论使用层次分析法为群决策项目赋分更加科学客观,具可操作性。

Objective To develop a scientific and index for the local government food safety supervision evaluation. Methods Using analytic hierarchy process （AHP）, evaluation index comparison table was designed, the supervision personnel from different governmentdepartments at all levels was invited to fill in the tableindependently according to his judgment. The weight and score of evaluation index was analyzed and calculated by summary analysis. Results ① The weight of 8 level-one index including improvingthe institutional mechanisms, cracking down on crimes, urging the enterprises to implement their responsibility, status of food safetypriorities, food safety accident treatment, food safety information disclosure, publicity and educationand award report was 21.3% , 16.4% , 14.7% , 13.5% , 13.2% , 7.3% , 7. 1% and 6.5% ; ② The weight and score of level-two index was also calculated; ③ The AHP score and the original score were coherent with several exception; ④The institutional mechanism, cracking clown crimes, urging the enterprises to implement their responsibility would be the priorities of local government. Conclusion Group deeision-making scoring using analytic hierarchy process was more scientific, objective and operable.