期刊文献+

城市再生水BOT项目的最优拍卖机制设计

On Mechanism Design of Auction in Urban Reused Water BOT Project
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于政府部门对拍卖使用日益的增加,讨论了城市再生水BOT项目拍卖的机制设计问题。为了提高项目拍卖者对城市再生水BOT项目特许经营权的配置效率,从政府的角度设计了一套科学合理的特许经营权竞标机制。基于激励机制设计思想,建立了满足个体理性和激励相容性约束的拍卖机制模型,通过模型求解得到最优的竞标机制,并利用歧视价格拍卖实现了最优机制。实例分析表明,该机制既能诱导竞标企业说真话,真实地披露自己的成本类型信息,又能提高政府对城市再生水BOT项目的配置效率,为政府进行城市再生水BOT项目的拍卖提供了重要的理论工具,具有一定的理论意义和实际应用价值。 Motivated by the increasing use of auctions by government agencies,the mechanism design of auction in urban reused water BOT project is considered.Auction is an effective means of resource allocation and mechanism of price revealed.In this paper,by using the mechanism design theory and auction theory,a feasible mechanism is explored to improve the allocation efficiency of franchise bidding.The auction model developed is based on the incentive mechanism design approach,it assures that the bidders satisfy the conditions of incentive-compatibility constraints and express their true preferences and efficiencies to maximize the utility of government expected social welfare.The optimal auction mechanism can be reached when the solution of the model is obtained.In the example,the mechanism can induce the bidding firms saying the truth,but also can improve the efficiency of the urban reused water BOT project.It provides an important theoretical tool for the auction of urban reused water BOT project,and has the certain theoretical significance and practical application value
作者 严培胜
出处 《长江大学学报(自科版)(上旬)》 CAS 2014年第7期1-4,共4页 JOURNAL OF YANGTZE UNIVERSITY (NATURAL SCIENCE EDITION) SCI & ENG
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71071119 71231007) 国家哲学社会科学基金资助项目(12BGL027) 湖北省教育厅资助项目(Q2012190314G289) 湖北水事研究中心项目(2013B007)
关键词 城市再生水BOT项目 特许经营权 歧视价格拍卖 激励机制 BOT franchise bidding discriminatory auction incentive mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献29

  • 1肖条军,盛昭潮,周晶.交通BOT项目投资的对策分析[J].经济数学,2002,19(4):40-46. 被引量:7
  • 2王娅,宇德明.决策BOT项目特许权期限的模型[J].基建优化,2004,25(5):12-15. 被引量:3
  • 3高丽峰,张国杰,杜燕.利用动态博弈中的“分蛋糕”模型确定BOT项目特许权期[J].商业研究,2006(2):24-26. 被引量:16
  • 4Mills, G.. Welfare and profit divergence for a tolled link in a road network [J]. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy,1995, 29: 137-146.
  • 5Verhoef, E. The Economics of regulating road transport [M]. Edwars elgar, Brokfield, 1996.
  • 6Yang, H. , Meng, Q.. Highway pricing and capacity choice in a road network under a build-operate-transfer scheme [J]. Transportation Research, 34A, 2000, 207 -222.
  • 7Liu, L. N. ,. McDonald, J. F.. Economic efficiency of second-best congestion pricing schemes in urban highway systems[J].Transportation Research, 1999,33B: 157 -188.
  • 8Schmidt, K. M.. The costs and benefits of privatization., an incomplete contracts approach [J]. Journal of Law, E-conomics and Organization, 1996, 12 (1) : 1- 24.
  • 9Schmidt, K. M.. Incomplete contract and privatization [J]. European Economic Review, 1996, 40 (3) : 569 -579.
  • 10Schmitz, P. W.. Allocating control in agency p roble- mswith limited liability and sequential hidden actions [J]. Rand Journal of Economics, 2005, 36 (2) :318- 336.

共引文献111

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部