期刊文献+

人权领域之国家豁免规则的新发展——兼论我国的国家豁免立法 被引量:1

Influence of human rights protection: on state immunity rules and corresponding measures—— on state immunity legislation in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 保护人权的国际强行法规则是否可列为国家豁免规则的例外,已成为后者发展中面临的新问题。实践表明,国家豁免规则可以与强行法共存,二者在程序和实体上拥有不同的属性,为此,在违反人权情形下援引国家豁免规则应区分公私行为性质、分清损害对象,敦促违反国在诉讼程序外承担"非免责性"后果。在国际交往愈加频繁深刻的时代背景下,国家豁免规则的具体落实更依赖于国内法律制度的完善,而中国进行专门的国家豁免立法是时代的必然。 With the development of a large number of human rights rules are becoming jus cogens, the issue on whether individuals or countries can invoke jus cognes to exclude the application of sate immunity in the court of mischief has been further developed in theory and practice. State practice shows that state immunity and jus cogens can coexist and the two have different attributes on procedural and substantive aspects. Thus the prosecuting country should distinguish acts of nature, distinguish victims and push the violating country to bear the‘non-exemption’ responsibility when citing state immunity in the case of human right violations. In the era of increasingly and profoundly frequent international exchanges, the specific implementation of the state immunity rules are more dependent on sound domestic legal system, thus formulating the specialized Chinese legislation on state immunity is inevitable.
作者 王萍
机构地区 武汉大学法学院
出处 《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2014年第4期86-90,共5页 Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences
关键词 管辖豁免 人权保护 强行法 国家责任 国家豁免立法 jurisdictional immunity human rights protection Jus Cogens state responsibility state immunity legislation
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Claims against the Empire oflran, BVertGE, ILR, Vol. 16, 1963.
  • 2《豁免公约(2004)》第12条.
  • 3联合国文件,A/46/10.1991年中文版,第113-117页.
  • 4Case Concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company (Belgium v. Spain), ICJ Reports, 1970, p. 3.
  • 5Ferrini v. Germany, Appeal decision, No. 5044/4; ILDC 19(IT 2004), 2004.
  • 6Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig, PCIJ, Ser. B, No. 15, 1928, pp. 17-8.
  • 7European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Art. 6(1), Nov. 4, 1950, 213 UNTS 222.
  • 8Von Dardel v. USSR, 623 F. Supp. 246 (D.D.C.1985).
  • 9劳特派特.奥本海国际法·上卷(第一分册)[M].王铁崖等译,北京:商务印书馆,1989:200-202.
  • 10Lee M. Caplan. State Immunity, Human Rights, and Jus Cogens: A Critique of the Normative Hierarchy Theory [J]. American Journal of International Law, 2003, 97(4): 758.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部