摘要
Research on Lu Xun is never simply the analysis of an individual writer, but constitutes an understanding of the cultural attributes represented by Lu Xun himself and his writings. Likewise, the evaluation of research on Lu Xun is never a simple evaluation of academic history, but rather a social evaluation associated with the value orientations of those times. At present, with the return of academic logic and the growing tendency toward private research, a noteworthy divergence of standpoints and evaluations of Lu Xun research has emerged. At the same time, as a prominent discipline that has been over-interpreted, research on Lu Xun is demonstrating a tendency toward redundancy and triviality. Three fundamental paradigms are commonly employed in research on Lu Xun： historical research that attempts to explore historical materials; academic research that focuses on knowledge interpretation and aesthetic evaluation; and contemporary research that pursues the contemporary meaning and values of Lu Xun＇s ideas. Each paradigm offers an insight into and understanding of Lu Xun＇s rich and complex spiritual world; each presents a paradox of one kind or the other; and each performs different value functions.
鲁迅研究从来不是单纯的个体作家分析,而是对其人其文所表征的一种文化属性的理解;对于鲁迅研究的评价也从来不是一种单纯的学术史的评价,而是与一个时代的价值取向相关联的社会评价。当下,在学术逻辑回归与学术民间性凸显的态势下,鲁迅研究的立场和价值评价出现了明显分野。同时,作为一种被过度阐释的显学,鲁迅研究存在着研究的重复性和细小化倾向。以史料挖掘为主的历史性研究、以知识阐释和审美评价为主的学问化研究、以追求思想的当下意义与价值为主的当代性研究,是鲁迅研究的三种基本范式。每一种研究范式都是对鲁迅丰富复杂的精神世界的开掘和理解,同时又都存在着某种程度的悖论和不同的价值功能。
