期刊文献+

内部薪酬差距与公司绩效——基于上市公司的实证研究 被引量:23

The internal pay gap and company performance:An empirical study based on listedcorporation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以2007-2010年A股上市公司为研究样本,研究在不同的环境下,高管团队与普通员工的薪酬差距对公司绩效的影响。研究发现:高管团队与普通员工的薪酬差距对公司绩效起促进作用。锦标赛理论成为近年来解释我国上市公司内部薪酬差距对公司绩效影响的有效理论。随着企业员工薪酬的不同,高管团队与普通员工的薪酬差距对公司绩效的影响也会不同。具体表现在,与员工薪酬比较低的企业相比,在员工薪酬比较高的企业中,加大高管团队与普通员工的薪酬差距将更有利于公司绩效的提高。此外,企业性质也会影响到薪酬差距对公司绩效的作用。具体来说,与国有性质企业相比,非国有性质企业的薪酬差距对公司绩效提升的促进作用更大。 Based on the data of Chinese listed companies from 2007 to 2010, we study the influenceon the performance of the company caused by the pay gap of top management team and the generalstaff under different conditions. The study found: Improving the pay gap are beneficial to improvingthe performance of the company. Tournament Theory becomes a useful theory explaining the influenceon the performance of the company caused by the pay gap recently in China. Compared withenterprises in which the staff has a lower salary, increasing the pay gap will greatly improve theperformance of the company in enterprises in which the staff has a higher salary. Moreover, the natureof enterprises will always influence the performance of the company caused by the pay gap. Comparedwith the state - owned enterprises, non state owned enterprises promote the positive influence on theperformance of the company caused by the pay gap.
作者 常健
出处 《南方经济》 CSSCI 2014年第8期71-90,共20页 South China Journal of Economics
关键词 薪酬差距 公司绩效 锦标赛理论 行为理论 The pay gap Companyperformance Tournament Theory Behavior Theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1Bloom, M. , 1999, "The performance effects of pay dispersion on individuals and organizations," The Academy of Management Journal, 42 ( 1 ), pp. 25 - 40.
  • 2Core, J.E., R.W. Holthausen and D.F. Larcker, 1999, " Corporate Governance, Chief Executive Officer Compensation, and Firm Performance," Journal of Financial Economics, 3 ( 51 ), pp. 371 - 406.
  • 3Eriksson, T. , 1999, "Executive Compensation and Tournament Theory: Empirical Tests on Danish Data," Journal of Labor Economics, 17 (2), pp. 262 -280.
  • 4Hambrick, D.C. and P.A. Siegel, 1997, "Pay Dispersion within Top Management Groups: Harmful Effects on performance of High-Technology Firms, " Academy of Management Proceedings, 1 ( 2 ), pp. 26 - 30.
  • 5Henderson, A.D. and J.W. Fredrickson, 2001, "Top management team coordination needs and the CEO Pay gap : a competitive test of economic and behavioral views," Academy of Management Journal, 1 ( 44 ) ', pp. 96 - 117.
  • 6Jackson, S. , T. Lopez and A. Reitenga, 2008, "Accounting Fundamental and CEO Bonus Compensation," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 5 ( 27 ), pp. 374 - 393.
  • 7Jayant, S. , 2009, "Rank - Order Tournaments and Incentive Alignment: The Effect on Firm Performance," The Journal offinance , 10 (3), pp. 1479 -1509.
  • 8Jensen, M. and K. Murphy, 1990, "Performance Compensation and Top Management Incentives," Journal of Political Economy, 4 ( 98 ), pp. 225 - 264.
  • 9Jonathan, S. , 1990, " Executive Pay and Firm Performance," Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 5 (3), pp. 212 - 230.
  • 10Kato, T. and C. Long, 2006, "Executive Turnover and Firm Performance in China," American Economic Association, 96 ( 2), pp. 363 - 367.

二级参考文献301

共引文献6272

同被引文献229

引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部