期刊文献+

技术标准中专利信息不披露行为的审查对策 被引量:2

The Review Strategy on Non-disclosure Act for Patent Information in Technical Standards
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国标准化组织尚未规定针对违反专利信息披露义务的罚责。在审查专利信息不披露行为时,参与标准制修订的组织或个人如果明显违反了合同义务,应当给予更严重的惩罚。未参与的组织或个人不负有披露义务,但有可能构成专利权滥用行为,标准实施者可以此进行抗辩或请求反不正当竞争和反垄断审查。未披露必要专利信息行为的审查需要考虑专利本身的市场价值和在标准中的作用,而未披露非必要专利的行为则需要结合不披露主体的行为是否正当性进行判断。国家标准的制修订组织负有更强的专利信息披露的注意义务。标准制定组织的特殊性和行业本身的法律规定在审查中不容忽视。 There is no no penalty provision concerning non-disclosure act of patent information made by standardization organization in China. In the examination of non-disclosure act of patent information, the organizations or individuals participate in standard formulation and revision should undertake severe punishment, if they breach contractual obligation in evidence. The implementers of the standard may opposite against or request an examination of anti-unfair competition and anti-monopoly on patent abuse of non- participants, who are not responsible for disclosure of patent information. The examination of non-disclosure act of necessary information of patent should consider the market value of patent and the effect in the standard, while of unnecessary should consider whether the the act of subject is legitimate. There are more obligations to disclose patent information for national standardization organizations. The particularity of the standardization organizations and the industry laws should not be ignored in the examination.
出处 《知识产权》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第8期64-68,共5页 Intellectual Property
关键词 专利 技术标准 专利信息披露制度 patent technical standards disclosure system of patent information
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1最高人民法院在(2008)民三他字第4号.
  • 2广西在(2007)桂民三终字第46号.
  • 3最高人民法院于2009年6月18El公布的《关于审理侵犯专利权纠纷案件应用法律若干问题的解释》(征求意见稿).
  • 4黄姝:《沉默是“金”——论标准中的专利默认许可》,载《探索社会主义司法规律与完善民商事法律制度研究——全国法院第23届学术讨论会获奖论文集(下)》2011年,第1154页.
  • 5欧阳石文、曲淑君:《解读专利权评价报告制度》,载国家知识产权局条法司编:《专利法研究2009》,知识产权出版社2010年7月第1版,第337页.
  • 6赵启杉,黄良才.技术标准中的事先披露原则——VITA新专利政策介评[J].电子知识产权,2007(6):23-27. 被引量:11
  • 7Ohly, Ansgar, Reverse Engineering: Unfair Competition or Catalyst for Innovation?. Patents and Technological Progress in a Globalized World: Liber Amicorum, Joseph Straus, ed., pp. 535-552, Berlin, Springer, 2009.
  • 8李华荣.技术正义论[J].中北大学学报(社会科学版),2002,20(4):18-21. 被引量:6

二级参考文献11

  • 1[美]约翰·罗尔斯.正义论.何怀宏译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988.
  • 2[3][美]A·麦金太尔.谁之正义、何种何理性[M].北京:当代中国出版社,1996.
  • 3"IEC, ISO and ITU. the world's leading developers of international standards agree on common patent policy "[EB/OL].[2007-03-28].http://www.itu.int/newsroom/press-releases/2007/05.html.
  • 4"Disclosure and licensing of patent in standards" [EB/OL].[2007-03-28]. http://www.vita.com/disclosure.
  • 5FTC's Bureau of Competition. "FTC Finds Rambus Unlawfully Obtained Monopoly Power", [EB/OL]. [2007-01-08] http://www.ftc.goviopa/2006/08/rambus.htm.
  • 6..商务部处长安伯生在“第八届信息技术领域专利态势发布会暨第三届信息产业知识产权与技术标准高峰论坛”上的讲话[EB/OL]..http://www.techweb.com.cn/ news/2006-12-15 /131130.shtml,,[2006-12-20]..
  • 7Thomas O. Barnett."DOJ business review letter" [EB/ OL].[2006-11-28]. http://www.vita.com/disclosure/DOJ% 20Business%20Review%20Letter%20Oct%202006.pdf.
  • 8Platt Majoras. "Recognizing the pro-competitive poten tial of royalty discussions in standard setting" [EB/OL].[2007-12-28].http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/majoras/050923stanford.pdf.
  • 9Platt Majoras,"ANTITRUST DIVISION ENDORSES EX ANTE DISCLOSE OF MAXIMUM ROYALTY RATE AND LICENSING TERMS IN CONTEXT OF STANDARD SETTING" [EB/OL].http://www.willkie.com/files/tbl_s29Publications%5CFileUpload5686%SC2346%5CAntitrust% 20Division% 20Endorses% 20Ex% 20Ante%20Disclosure.pdf
  • 10Earl Nied."Disclosure of Patents and Licensing Practices in Global SDOs" [C]..CESI第二届IT标准与知识产权国际研讨会.,..

共引文献15

同被引文献23

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部