美学大讨论的学术史分歧与重写美学史

The Academic History Differences of the Aesthetic Discussion and Rewriting the History of Aesthetics

"美学大讨论"在当下美学学术史书写中出现了种种不可调和的意见分歧。只有打破"前见",从原始史料的翻检细读出发,基于"文献——发生学"视界上对之加以美学史重写,才能在历史语境化的考释廓清中纠偏各种学术史中的观点偏差。"重写美学史"的学术史意义不仅在于钩沉与解蔽美学史事件中的诸多美学"空白点",还原"美学大讨论"的现象史原貌,还在于匡正美学学术史的书写误差,为当下美学学科的纵深发展夯实基础,并提供历史的经验和借鉴。

In the academic nature and historical stages and factions division and other aspects are all ap-peared the irreconcilable different opinions in the aesthetics discussion movement, which leading to para-noia and differences in the current history of aesthetics. Only breaking the ＂Vorurteile＂, starting from theclosereadingof the original historical materials, based on the method of philological genetics and rewri-ting the history of aesthetics, can be corrected the various of research views diverge and demarked themany of aesthetics ＂blank＂ . So as to reduction the phenomenon history appearance of the Big Discussionof Aesthetics and provides the historical experience and lessons for the deep development of the contempo-rary aesthetic subject.