摘要
目的 比较不同浓度甲磺酸罗哌卡因实施颈丛神经阻滞的效果. 方法 选择美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级Ⅰ~Ⅱ级甲状腺腺瘤患者80例,采用随机数字表法将患者随机分成A、B、C、D4组,每组20例,依次采用0.55%、0.45%、0.35%、0.25%甲磺酸罗哌卡因实施颈丛神经阻滞,观察各组患者麻醉后的镇痛效果及呼吸和心率(heart rate,HR)的变化.结果 A、B、C、D组镇痛效果的平均秩次依次为27、26、26、15,A、B、C组的镇痛效果明显高于D组(P<0.05),A、B、C组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).A、B、C、D组呼吸困难程度的平均秩次依次为16、38、39、67,A组呼吸困难程度明显高于B、C、D组(P<0.05).A、B、C、D组HR增加的平均秩次依次为20、39、39、62,A组HR增加明显高于B、C、D组(P<0.05). 结论 0.35%~0.45%甲磺酸罗哌卡因是颈丛神经阻滞较为合适的局麻药浓度.
Objective To compare the efficacy of different concentration of ropivacaine mesylate in cervical plexus nerve block.Methods Eighty ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ thyroid adenoma patients were randomly divided into four groups:group A,group B,group C and group D (n=20),which were respectively performed cervical plexus nerve block with 0.55%,0.45%,0.35%,0.25% Ropivacaine Mesylate.The analgesic effect and changes of breathing rate and heart rate (HR) were observed.Results Compared with group D(15),the mean rank of analgesic effect in group A,group B and group C(27,26,26) was significantly higher(P〈0.05).The mean rank of difficulty breathing in group B,group C and group D (38,39,67) were higher than that in group A(16) (P〈0.05).The mean rank of increased HR in group B,group C and group D(39,39,62) were higher than that in group A(20)(P〈0.05).Conclusions 0.35%-0.45% ropivacaine mesylate is appropriate concentration in cervical plexus nerve block.
出处
《国际麻醉学与复苏杂志》
CAS
2014年第8期677-678,683,共3页
International Journal of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation
关键词
颈丛
神经阻滞
罗哌卡因
Cervical plexus
Nerve block
Ropivacaine Mesylate