期刊文献+

复发胰腺癌和前列腺癌再放疗中脉冲式低剂量率(PLDR)调强治疗计划的设计和应用 被引量:4

IMRT for Recurrent Pancreas and Prostate Cancer Using Pulsed Low Dose Rate Delivery Techniques
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:设计一种用于复发的胰腺癌和前列腺癌放射治疗的PLDR-IMRT计划。方法:选择10例复发胰腺癌和10例复发前列腺癌患者,每个计划设置10个非共面射野,采用各种优化手段使得计划满足PLDR治疗的要求。并与三维适形(PLDR-3DCRT)计划和旋转调强(PLDR-ARC)计划比较。结果:胰腺癌PLDR-IMRT计划中,每个单独的射野中PTV的平均剂量在17.6cGy到22.4cGy之间,最大剂量的范围从22.9cGy到34.8cGy。前列腺癌病例中,PTV在每个单独的射野中的平均剂量在18.8cGy到22.6cGy之间,最大剂量的范围从24.0cGy到34.7cGy。IMRT计划中危及器官的剂量大大小于三维适形计划,接近旋转调强计划。结论:在脉冲式低剂量率放射治疗中,通过优化的设计,IMRT计划相对于通常使用的3DCRT计划更有优势,在保证靶区剂量的基础上降低了危及器官受量。 Objective: To investigate the planning techniques for IMRT-based PLDR treatment for recurrent pan-creatic and prostate cancer cases. Methods:Ten cases of recurrent recurrent pancreatic and 10 cases of prostate cancer pa-tients were included in this study. Treatment plans were generated with 10 gantry angles using the step-and-shot delivery technique, which can be delivered in three-minute intervals to achieve an effective low-dose rate. The IMRT plans were compared with the 3DCRT plans and ARC plans. Results:For the ten pancreas cases investigated, the mean PTV dose for each gantry angle in the IMRT plans ranged from 17. 6 cGy to 22. 4 cGy. The maximum doses ranged between 22. 9 cGy and 34. 8 cGy. For the ten prostate cases investigated, the mean PTV doses for individual gantry angles ranged from 18. 8 cGy to 22. 6 cGy. The maximum doses per gantry angle were between 24. 0 cGy and 34. 7 cGy. A significant reduction in the OAR dose was achieved with IMRT compared with 3DCRT. Conclusion:Compared with 3DCRT, IMRT could provide superior target coverage and normal tissue sparing for PLDR reirradiation of recurrent pancreatic and prostate cancers.
出处 《肿瘤预防与治疗》 2014年第3期120-125,共6页 Journal of Cancer Control And Treatment
基金 四川省卫生厅项目 编号:090533
关键词 再放疗 脉冲式低剂量率 调强放射治疗 Reirradiation Pulsed Low Dose Rate ( PLDR) PLDR-IMRT
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Richards GM,Tome WA,Robins HI,et al.Pulsed reduced dose-rate radiotherapy:a novel locoregional retreatment strategy for breast cancer recurrence in the previously irradiated chest wall,axilla,or supraclavicular region [ J].Breast Cancer Res Treat,2009,114(2):307-313.
  • 2Nieder C,Milas E,Aug KK.Tissue tolerance to reirradiation[ J ].Semin Radiat Oncol,2000,10(2):200-209.
  • 3Marks LB,Ten Haken RK,Martel MK.Quantitative analyses of normal tissue effects in the clinic [ J ].Suppl Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2010,76(1):S1-S160.
  • 4Tome WA,Howard SP.On the possible increase in local turnout control probability for gliomas exhibiting low dose hyperradiosensi-tivity using a pulsed schedule[J].Br J Radiol,2007,80(1):32-37.
  • 5Hall EJ,Giaccia AJ.Radiobiology for the radiologist,6th ed [ M].Philadelphia:Lippincott Williams & Wilkius,2006:352-370.
  • 6Joiner MC,Marples B,Lambin P,et al.Low-dose hypersensitivi-ty:current status and possible mechanisms[ J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2001,49(2):379-389.
  • 7Resch A,Fellner C,Mock U,et al.Locally recurrent breast cancer:pulsed dose rate brachytherapy for repeat irradiation fol-lowing lumpectomy-a second chance to preserve the breast [ J ].Radiology,2002,225(3):713-718.
  • 8Marples B.Is low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity a measure of G2-phase cell radiosensitivity? [ J].Cancer Metastasis Rev,2004,23(1)197-207.
  • 9Harney 3,Short SC,Shah N,et al.Low dose hyper-radiosensitiv-ity in metastasis tumors[ J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2004,59(4):1190-1195.
  • 10Peiffert D,Castelain B,Thomas L,et al.Pus]ed dose rate brachytherapy in head and neck cancer:Feasibility study of a French cooperative group[ J].Radiother Oncol,2001,58(1):71-75.

同被引文献30

  • 1Richards GM, Tome WA, Robins HI, et al. Pulsed reduced doserate radiotherapy: a novel locoregional retreatment strategy for breast cancer recurrence in the previously irradiated chest wall, axilla, or supraclavicular region [ J ]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2009, 114(2) :307-313.
  • 2Nieder C, Mi|as L, Ang KK. Tissue tolerance to reirradiation [J].Semin Radiat Oncol, 2000,10(2) :200-209.
  • 3Marks LB, Ten HakenRK, Martel MK. Quantitative analyses of normal tissue effects in the clinic [ J ] . Suppl Int JRadiat Oncol Biol pHys ,2010,76 ( 1 ) : S1-S160.
  • 4Tome WA, Howard SP. On the possible increase in local tumour control probability for gliomas exhibiting low dose hyperrediosensitivity using a pulsed schedule [ J ]. Br J Radiol, 2007,80( 1 ) :32-37.
  • 5Joiner MC, Marples B, Lambin P, et al. Low - dose hypersensitivity:current status and possible mechanisms[J] . Int J Radiat Oneol BiolpHys,2001,49 (2) :379-389.
  • 6Rasch A,Fellner C,Mock U,et al. Locally recurrent breast cancer: pulsed dose rate braebytheralpy for repeat irradiation following lumpectomy- a second chance to preserve the breast [ J ]. Radiolagy,2002,225 (3) :713-718.
  • 7Marples B. Is low - dose hyper - radiosensitivity a measure of G2 - phase cell radiosensitivity [ J ]. Cancer Metastasis Rev, 2014,3 ( 1 ) : 197-207.
  • 8Cannon GM, Tome WA, Robins HI, et al. Pulsed reduced doserate radiotherapy:case report, a novel re - treatment strategy in the management of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme [ J ]. J Neurol Oncol,2007,83 (2) :307-311.
  • 9Adkison JB, Tome W, Seo S, et al. Reirradiation of large - volumerecurrent glioma with pulsed reduced - dsee - rate radiotherapy [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol pHys,2011,79(3) :835-841.
  • 10Ma CM, Lin MH, Dai XF, et al. Investigation of poised low dose rate radiotherapy using dynamic arc delivery techniques [ J ]. pHys Med Biol,2012,57(14) :4613-4626.

引证文献4

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部