期刊文献+

左心室收缩功能正常的老年冠心病患者无保护左主干病变PCI治疗预后的影响因素 被引量:1

Factors influencing prognosis in percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary disease in elderly coronary heart disease patients with normal left ventricular systolic function
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨左心室收缩功能正常(左心室射血分数≥40%)的老年冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病(冠心病)患者无保护左主干(unprotected left main,ULM)病变经皮冠状动脉介入(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)治疗预后的影响因素。方法回顾性分析2009年1月至2011年12月在广西壮族自治区人民医院因ULM接受PCI治疗的左心室收缩功能正常的患者112例的临床资料和冠状动脉造影结果。根据患者的情况分为非老年组(年龄<60岁)和老年组(≥60岁),比较两组间的基线资料和冠状动脉造影结果。应用多因素回归分析法观察年龄对ULM介入治疗结果的预测价值。结果总计入选符合条件的患者112例,其中非老年组42例和老年组70例。老年组糖尿病、高脂血症、吸烟史、既往PCI治疗、主要心脑血管不良事件(MACCE)、术后心肌梗死发生率明显高于非老年组,差异有统计学意义(分别为42.9%vs.21.1%,P=0.021;40%vs.11.9%,P=0.040;28.6%vs.9.5%,P=0.017;18.6%vs.4.8%,P=0.038;48.6%vs.23.8%,P=0.009;22.9%vs.0%,P=0.001)。Logistics回归分析得出女性、年龄、吸烟史、合并多支血管病变、远端或分叉病变均为主要心脑血管不良事件的独立预测因素。结论左心室收缩功能正常的患者,其年龄因素是ULM介入治疗预后不良的强力预测因素。 Objectives To evaluate the factors influencing prognosis in percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) for unprotected left main (ULM) coronary disease in elderly coronary heart disease patients with normal left ventricular systolic function.Methods The relevant baseline and outcome data of 112 patients undergoing PCI for ULM disease in elderly coronary heart disease patients with normal left ventricular systolic function in The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region were collected from January 2009 to December 2011.The enrolled patients were divided into two groups according to the age:younger group (age〈60 years,n=42) and elderly group (age≥60 years,n=70).The baseline and outcome data were compared between the two groups.Multivariate regression analysis was performed to appraise the prognostic role of age in patients undergoing PCI for ULM disease.Results Diabetes mellitus,hyperlipidaemia,smoking history,previous PCI,major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral vascular event (MACCE) and myocardial infarction rate were higher in elderly group than in younger group (42.9% vs.21.1%,P=0.021 ; 40% vs.11.9%,P=0.040; 28.6% vs.9.5%,P=0.017; 18.6% vs.4.8%,P=0.038; 48.6% vs.23.8%,P=0.009; 22.9% vs.0%,P=0.001 ; respectively).Female gender,age ≥ 60 years,smoking history,complicated with multi-vessel disease,left main coronary artery distal or bifurcation lesion were independent predictors of MACCE by Logistic regression analysis.Conclusions Age over 60 years is the strongest predictor in PCI for ULM disease in coronary heart disease patients with normal left ventricular systolic function.
出处 《岭南心血管病杂志》 2014年第4期430-433,共4页 South China Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases
关键词 冠状动脉疾病 药物涂层支架 血管成形术 经腔 经皮冠状动脉 无保护左主干 coronary heart disease drug-eluting stent percutaneous coronary intervention unprotected left main
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献17

  • 1CHANCE研究组.无保护左主干病变支架置入术预后及影响因素的分析——中国无保护左主干病变支架置入术注册(CHANCE)研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(3):210-215. 被引量:19
  • 2GAO Run-lin XU Bo CHEN Ji-lin HAN Ya-ling LI Zhan-quan LUE Shu-zheng QI Xiao-yong HUO Yong WANG Le-feng CHEN Jun-zhu SHEN Wei-feng FANG Wei-yi JIA San-qing.PROGNOSIS OF UNPROTECTED LEFT MAIN CORONARY ARTERY STENTING AND THE FACTORS AFFECTING THE OUTCOMES IN CHINESE[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2006(1):14-20. 被引量:10
  • 3陈国伟 郑宗鄂.现代心脏内科学.冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1995.898-900.
  • 42 Krishaswami S,Jacob J,Joseph G,Lack of correlation between coronary risk factors and CAD severity. Int J Cardiol,1994,47(1):37~43.
  • 54,Inoue T,Oku K,Kimoto K,et al. Relationship of cigarette smoking to the severity of coronary and thoracic aortic atherosclerosis. Cardiology,1995,86(5):374~379.
  • 6[1]O′keefe JH, Hartzier GO, Rutherford BD, et al. Left main coronary angioplasty: early and late results of 127 acute and elective procedures.Am J Cardiol, 1989,64:144-147.
  • 7[2]Guidelines for percutanecus transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Task Force on Assessment of diagnostic and therapeutic cadiovascular procedures ( committee on percutaneeus transluminal coronary angioplasty). Circulation, 1993,88:2987-3007.
  • 8[3]Tommaso CL. Has the time come for percutaneous intervention of left main coronary artery disease? Cath Cardiovasc Diagn, 1996,37:81-82.
  • 9[4]Lopez J J, Ho KK, Stoler RC, et al. Percutaneous treatment of protected and unprotected left main. coronary stenoses with new devices: immediate angiographic results and intermediate-term follow up. J Am Coil Cardiol, 1997,29:345-352.
  • 10[5]Park S J, ParkSW, HongMK, et al. Stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery stenoses: immediate and late outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998,31:37-42.

共引文献8

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部