利用谢弗勒教育定义的类型分析教育技术的定义

Using the types of Scheffler's education definition to analyze the definitions of educational technology

在介绍谢弗勒根据教育言论中定义的性质,把定义分成描述性定义、规定性定义、纲领性定义三种类型的基础上,分析比较了AECT历次教育技术定义和南国农先生历次电化教育定义属于描述性定义,何克抗"现代教育技术"定义、黎加厚"电化教育"定义属于典型的规定性定义以及尹俊华等"教育技术"定义、汪基德"电化教育"定义使用纲领性定义的方式来给教育技术下定义。指出任何一个定义往往同时具备"规定性"、"描述性"和"纲领性"的属性,糅合教育技术的三类定义并对其可界定为:教育技术是指通过对技术在教育中的应用进行设计、开发、利用、管理和评价以优化、促进教与学的理论与实践。

According to the definition into descriptive definition, nature of definitions in the education speech, Sheffler divided the regulative definition, and programmatic definition. The paper analyzes AECT＇s definitions of educational technology; Mr. Nan Guonong＇s previous E-education definition that belongs to descriptive definition; He Kekang＇s modem educational technology definition; Li Jiahou＇s E-education definition, which is a typical regulative definition; Yin Junhua ＇s educational technology definition; and Wang Jide＇s E-education definition, which is programmatic definition. Any definition often includes the properties of regulative, descriptive and programmatic features at the same time. By combining the three kinds of definitions, educational technology may be defined as the design, development, utilization, management and evaluation of technology in education in order to optimize and promote the theory and practice of teaching and learning.