司法研究方法的反思与批判

Rethinking and Criticism of Methods of Judicial Research

司法对转型中国具有重要的意义,如何研究司法就成为一个重要问题。既有的关于司法的研究方法有四种,这些方法作为研究进路各有利弊。情境论主张整体、同情地分析研究对象,但缺乏价值上的超越意识;政法传统中的方法看到了司法背后的政治因素,但忽略司法独立性的价值与实在法对司法的意义;规范法学主张在制定法建构的法秩序中来研究司法,对规则多元与实质正义取向传统的忽略,是其最大的不足之处;回应型司法研究认为司法需要与社会互动、回应社会需求,但与社会过多的互动可能会消解法律权威,导致司法主体性丧失。对这四种研究方法的分析、反思与批判,对司法研究的推进具有基础性的理论意义。

The function of judicial authority gets more and more importance of the transition moment of China,so the research about the right and actual function of judicial authority in legal system construction becomes one of hot topics in academic circles,so it is necessary to read,rethink and criticize. The methods of situation research,political and legal research,legal regulation research and response type research are all significant to academic research,so it will advance the research and promote the function of judicial authority by inquest and analysis of these ideas.