期刊文献+

埃克替尼与吉非替尼治疗既往化疗失败的局部晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌患者的系统性评价 被引量:4

Efficacy and Safety of Icotinib and Gefitinib for Localized Advanced or Metastatic Non-small-cell Lung Carcinoma after Treatment Failure with Chemotherapy:a Systematic Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较埃克替尼与吉非替尼治疗既往化疗失败的局部晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的近期疗效及不良反应情况。方法:通过Medline、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国期刊全文数据库、中文生物医学期刊文献数据库和数字化期刊全文数据库等全面检索国内外相关文献,纳入埃克替尼和吉非替尼治疗既往化疗失败的局部晚期或转移性NSCLC的随机对照试验(RCTs),并对文献进行筛选、评价与分析。采用RevMan 4.2软件对入选研究的近期疗效及不良反应进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入符合标准的RCTs 2项,涉及423例病例。系统评价显示,异质性检验结果良好,可用固定效应模型进行分析。埃克替尼组与吉非替尼组比较,4周疾病控制率、半年总生存率、1年总生存率均无明显差异;埃克替尼组的28周疾病控制率优于吉非替尼组(P=0.01);埃克替尼组与吉非替尼组的皮疹、腹泻、咯血发生率均无显著差异,但埃克替尼治疗组的总不良反应发生率显著低于吉非替尼(P<0.000 01)。结论:对于既往化疗失败的局部晚期或转移性NSCLC,埃克替尼的疗效与吉非替尼相当,且总的耐受性优于吉非替尼。 OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of icotinib versus gefitinib for localized advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). METHODS:The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) both at home and abroad on icotinib versus gefitinib for treatment of localized advanced or metastatic NSCLC after treatment failure with chemothera-py were retrieved from such databases as Medline,Embase,Cochrane Library,CBM,CNKI,CMCC and Wanfang database. Liter-ature screening,assessment and analysis were carried out. Meta-analysis on the short-term efficacy and safety of the drugs were per-formed using RevMan 4.2. RESULTS:Two RCTs involving 423 patients meeting our inclusion criteria were included. The Me-ta-analysis revealed satisfactory homogeneity test results which can be analyzed using fixed effect model and no significant differenc-es between gefitinib and icotinib in disease control rate of 4 weeks,half year survival rate and 1-year survival rate. However,the icotinib group showed better disease control rate of 28 weeks than did gefitinib group. No significant differences were noted be-tween gefitinib group and icotinib group in the incidences of rash,diarrhea and hemoptysis;however,the total incidence rate of ad-verse drug reactions in icotinib group was statistically lower than in the gefitinib group (P&lt;0.000 01). CONCLUSIONS:For pa-tients with advanced NSCLC,icotinib is similar to gefitinib in efficacy and has better tolerance than gefitinib.
出处 《中国医院用药评价与分析》 2014年第7期602-605,共4页 Evaluation and Analysis of Drug-use in Hospitals of China
关键词 埃克替尼 吉非替尼 非小细胞肺癌 Meta分析 Icotinib Gefitinib NSCLC Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, et al. Er- lotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer [J]. NEngl JMed,2005,353(2) : 123-132.
  • 2Kim ES, Hirsh V, Mok T, et al. Gefitinib versus doce- taxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer(IN- TEREST) : a randomised phase Ⅲ trial IJ]. Lancet, 2008,372(9652) : 1809-1818.
  • 3王家臣循证医学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:81.
  • 4陈建华,罗永忠,王伟,周文伟,文小平.盐酸埃克替尼与吉非替尼治疗化疗失败的非小细胞肺癌28例[J].中国新药杂志,2012,21(17):2056-2059. 被引量:14
  • 5Shi YK, Zhang L, Liu XQ, et al. Icotinib versus gefitinib in previously treated advanced non-small- cell lung cancer (ICOGEN) : a randomised, double-blind phase 3 non-in- feriority trial[J]. Lancet Oncol,2013,14(10) :953-961.
  • 6Saijo N, Kenmotsu H. Recent development of molecu- lar- targeted drugs in lung cancer [ J ]. Intern Med, 2010,49 (18):1923-1934.

二级参考文献13

  • 1PARKIN DM. Global cancer statistics in the year 2000[ J]. Lan- cet Oncol, 2001, 2(9) : 533 -543.
  • 2THERASSE P, ARBUCK SG, EISENHSUER EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada [J]. J Natl Cancer lnst, 2000, 92 (3) : 205 - 216.
  • 3AZZOLI CG, BAKER S JR, TEMIN S, et al. American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update on chemo- therapy for stage iv non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009,27 ( 36 ) : 6251 - 6266.
  • 4ETTINGER DS, AKERLEY W, BEPLER G, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer[J]. JNatl Compr Canc Netw, 2010, 8(7): 740 - 801.
  • 5FARRELL A. A close look at cancer[ J]. Nat Med, 2011, 17 ( 3 ) : 262 - 265.
  • 6FUKUOKA M,YANO S,GICCONE G,et al. Muhi-institution randomized phase Ⅱ trial of gefitinib for previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2003, 21(12): 2237-2246.
  • 7KRIS MG, NATALE RB, HERBST RS, et al. Efficacy of ge- fitinib, an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in symptomatic patients with non-small cell long cancer; a randomized trial [ J ]. JAMA, 2003, 290 (16) : 2149 - 2158.
  • 8CHANG A, PARIKH P, THONGPRASERT S, et al. Gefitinib (IRESSA) in patients of Asian origin with refractory advanced non-small cell lung cancer: subset analysis from the ISEL study [J]. Thora Oncol, 2006, 1(8): 847 -855.
  • 9SHEPHERD FA, RODRIGUES PEREIRA J, CIULEANU T, et al. Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer [J]. N Engl J Med, 2005, 353(2) : 123 - 132.
  • 10顾爱琴,王慧敏,施春雷,熊丽纹,高志强,韩宝惠.吉非替尼治疗125例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的临床观察[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2010,32(1):71-74. 被引量:29

共引文献13

同被引文献51

  • 1Lee SM, Khan I, Upadhyay S, et al. First-line erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer unsuita- ble for chemotherapy (TOPICAL) : a double-blind, place- bo-controlled, phase 3 trial [ J 1. Lancet Oncol, 2012, 13 (11) :1161-1170.
  • 2Ettinger DS, Akerley W, Bepler G, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer [ J ~. J Natl Compr Canc Netw,2010,8 ( 7 ) :740-801.
  • 3Cappuzzo F, Ciuleanu T, Stelmakh L, et al. Erlotinib as ma- inte~aance treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung canc- er: a muhicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 study ~ J 1. Lancet Onco1,2010,11 (6) :521-529.
  • 4Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, et al. Erlotinib versus chemothera- py as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802 ): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study[ J~. Lancet Oncol,2011,12 (8) :735-742.
  • 5Gatzemeier U, Pluzanska A, Szczesna A, et al. Phase llI st- udy of erlotinib in combination with cisplatin and gemcit- abine non-small-cell lung cancer:the Tarceva Lung Cancer Investigation Trial [ J ~. J Clin Oncol, 2007,25 ( 12 ) : 1545- 1552.
  • 6Herbst RS,Prager D, Hermann R, et al. TRIBUTE : a phase 111 trial of erlotinib hydrochloride (OSL-774) combined with carboplatin and paelitaxel chemotherapy in advanced non-small lung cancer [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2005,23 ( 25 ) : 5892-5899.
  • 7Takeda K, Hida T, Sato T, et al. Randomized phase 111I trial of platinum-doublet chemotherapy followed by gefitinib compared with continued platinum-doublet chemotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung canc- er:Results of a West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group trial ( WJTOG0203 ) [ J ]. J Clin Onco1,2010,28 (5) : 753-760.
  • 8Cappuzzo F, Ciuleanu T, Stelmakh L, et al. SATURN : A do- uble-blind, randomized, phase Ill study of maintenance erlo- tinib versus placebo following nonprogression with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC[ J~. J Clin Oncol,2009,27(15s) :8001.
  • 9P6rol M, Chouaid C, Milleron B J, et al. Maintenance with either gemcitabine or erlotinib versus observation with pre- defined second-line treatment after cisplatin-gemcitabine induction chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC: IFCT-GFPC 0502 phase ]]I study[J~. J Clin Oncol,2010,28 (15s) : 7507.
  • 10Zhang L, Shenglin M, Song X, et al. Efficacy, tolerability, and biomarker analyses from a phase III, randomized, place- bo-controlled, parallel group study of gefitinib as mainte- nance therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastat- ic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (INFORM; C- TONG 0804) [J3. J Clin Oncol,2011,29(15) :LBA7511.

引证文献4

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部